Answer the question
In order to leave comments, you need to log in
RE: Please comment on the site
Here from here .
My sister works for a window company. They made a website .
Please give your comments/remarks so that she can pass them on to the developer.
Thanks in advance!
PS tell me, how much will a normal site on the same topic cost and where to turn?
The site has been updated, what do you think?
Answer the question
In order to leave comments, you need to log in
The picture of the consultant girl is bewildering. The hover-state of the main navigation is annoying. No hover-state for "read more" buttons.
In general, I do not like the design.
Nothing personal, just a quick look at the site of a person who does not design and design interfaces.
why do you need a background image with such dimensions 1 920px × 1 100px?
In addition: I don't like the hat.
in contacts, the screen save from google maps was very amused =)))
1. Large weight of the site (images need to be optimized, it is better to remove the fin, at least partially)
2. Is the main page called about the company? It is better to write her name, and even better The name of the company is a specialization (and it is logical and good for SEO)
3. Incorrect html markup of the site, only the footer is in the main container, although this may make some sense. For seo, it's better to use a newer structure (there are good tips habrahabr.ru/blogs/html5/137049/ )
4. Why is this here pix.am/CkH0/
5. The color balance of the site is broken. Use kuler.adobe.com/
6. Due to poor optimization, the performance is not encouraging pix.am/HDG6/ (site tools.pingdom.com/ )
7. Minify scripts and styles (http://closure-compiler.appspot.com/home), or rather combine them into a smaller number of files pix.am/Pd48/
You can also connect libraries from servers, read code here. google.com/intl/en/apis/libraries/devguide.html
The site is heavily overloaded, the eyes just run up looking under the header.
the size of the navigation just kills, it is so large that the eyes do not pay attention to it.
there is a gray stripe on top, why is it at all? It's better to make navigation there like on Twitter.
a letter to the director in the most prominent place, it is clear that the person who got to the site immediately poke there and wrote what kind of site did you make ????
having entered the company's website, there was no desire to poke at other buttons and look for the price of services, the site does not fulfill its function
The site did not fit into my 1024x768 monitor. And horizontal scrolling is not good.
Again, in view of the small monitor, all the elements seem too large. And an incomprehensible gray large stripe in the header of the site. The button of the female consultant caused a slight bewilderment, in vain it was so rounded.
Another minus: the long response of the site (although my Internet is probably naughty here).
Tin. Round buttons absolutely do not correlate with the generally square interface. The blue color in the hat is generally superfluous. And in general, as it looks unfinished, damp.
Nothing personal. But I didn't like it.
And why is there a “live internet” button on the right outside the site, there is nowhere else to push it? If you narrow the window a little, it slides down and it turns out really bad.
Anything and everything can be improved, everyone would do it in their own way.
The main thing is customers, if the site does not bring them, then something needs to be changed,
if it does, change it, but carefully.
Bullying a user - a screenshot of google maps in contacts. I honestly tried to press the zoom (((
It seems that the site was made by a shkolota.
Say how much you paid for it.
PS: You were rightly advised above.
code.google.com/intl/ru-RU/apis/maps/documentation/staticmaps/
“A letter to the director” and “ask questions” are one and the same.)
In general, of course, it’s awful, it won’t stand the competition in St. Petersburg. For the province, I would still go.
1. Headlines in the blog with links to themselves (make them normal).
2. Indent from above.
3. The background is best left just gray.
4. The typography is creepy. Breaks between paragraphs would not hurt to align the block so that there would not be this red line.
5. Navigation main when hovering and when selecting an item has a different height.
6. In the gallery there is too much indentation on the right, it would be possible to reduce the width and height and put 3 pictures in a row.
7. The service section is empty.
And so the general impression is that the site is zhuuutko overloaded with unnecessary information.
Didn't find what you were looking for?
Ask your questionAsk a Question
731 491 924 answers to any question