Answer the question
In order to leave comments, you need to log in
Macos 27" 4k. Is this really a problem?
There was a need to add an external monitor to the macbook.
Macbook pro 15 2013, integrated vidyaha.
I read all sorts of things on the Internet, as a result, there were several questions left without a clear answer.
A lot of places write that it is very desirable for dpi for makosi to be a multiple of 110.
At 27 inches, this comes out to 5K.
4K in dpi is not a multiple of 110.
But 27 "5k is inhumane for the price today.
1. So the question is - does 27" 4k really look bad on a Mac and is it better to take 2k or is it all purely subjective perception?
2. Will a macbook pro of 2013 with an integrated video card pull a 4k monitor in principle or not?
Answer the question
In order to leave comments, you need to log in
In short - you can connect a 4k monitor. Another question is whether it suits you. Therefore, you don’t even have a question about 5K.
But 30hrz is clearly not what you want from a monitor. I had discrete graphics, but even there, I did not connect more than 2 1080k monitors.
HDMI video output (different results on DP)
Supports 1080p resolution at up to 60Hz
Supports 3840x2160 pixels at 30Hz
Supports 4096x2160 pixels at 24Hz
A lot of places write that it is very desirable for dpi for makosi to be a multiple of 110.
1. So the question is - does 27 "4k really look bad on a macos and is it better to take 2k or is it all purely subjective perception?
2. Will a macbook pro of 2013 with an integrated video card pull a 4k monitor in principle or not?
Didn't find what you were looking for?
Ask your questionAsk a Question
731 491 924 answers to any question