Is it worth putting an SSD in an office computer?

Question

Solid State Drives

Hello users!

Please help me answer %subj%. I would like to put an SSD in the office to give users maximum comfort. At the same time, 70% of all cases are stuffing information into Word / Excel files located on the server and in the browser, and 25% - a little graphic editor, a little scanning, etc. That is, without intensity.

TrueCrypt is also used. I plan the system on Core2Quad or i3.

The question is more about reliability: computers are used from 9 am to almost 9 pm 5 days a week. In this mode, there will be no SSD kirdyk in a year? I won’t buy expensive SSDs, but I can do 60-80 gigabytes. Maybe not show off, but just take hard drives the old fashioned way?

Answer 1

For the same money, you can buy 2 hard drives for each computer and tie them into RAID 1, this is where reliability will really increase, and office workers will be neither hot nor cold from SSD.

Answer 2

I think it's unreasonably expensive. Users, of course, will work (on / not) much more comfortable, but is it worth it? Will the increase in their performance (in financial terms) cover the purchase of new ssds once a year (or even more often - statistics are disappointing for cheap drives)?
I would personally choose for myself the option voiced by the author in the last sentence. Although it is certainly interesting to play around with how it will work. Alternatively, you can collect one machine for testing

Answer 3

A day of questions about SSDs on Habré :)
IMHO you shouldn’t bet, it’s better to buy better hardware with this money or give a premium :)

Answer 4

If for users, computer performance is a bottleneck in overall performance, and disk performance is a bottleneck in computer performance, then you can install an SSD and anything, just to eliminate the bottleneck.
Run perfmon on a typical user computer, set up disk activity data collection and analyze. If a sufficiently significant time during the working day the disk queue is full (physical disk counter /% disk activity) - then yes, purchasing an SSD is economically feasible.

Answer 5

If it were programmers, or engineers, or designers, or other people who use the hard drive intensively, then the benefit is clear.
Yes, it's still too expensive.

Answer 6

Don't show off.
SSD is not needed i3
C2Q is not needed
enough Core2Duo or even CoreDuo with a good frequency + 2G RAM + green screw from wd (for example
)
you can just turn in the disk and get a new one.

Answer 7

I worked with truecrypt and my tasks are much more resource-intensive than editing tables and driving data into the site, and believe me, provided that you have core i3 and Core2Quad, the conditions are already good for these tasks. Naturally, ssds will increase the response time of applications, but this time will be noticeable only when programs are loaded, and if they are loaded into memory, then no ssd will improve the comfort of work (unless you save very large files and the system does this for a long time).
For me, it will be more relevant just to increase people's memory so that they can comfortably open a dozen necessary programs and not close little-used ones "because it slows down."

Answer 8

“stuffing information in Word / Excel files located on the server and in the browser, but 25% is a little graphic editor, a little scanning, etc.” is unlikely to kill the SSD in a year when it comes to recording restrictions. And what dies more often: HDD or SSD - this is already a holistic question. Another thing, will users appreciate it? Mb and so satisfied with their performance?

Answer 9

For some reason, it read like “a company selling ssd offered a rollback, I’m looking for justification for buying an ssd for my boss to sign” :) But in general, there is a certain
sense in ssd for the office . SSD (but good, not just any) is a change in the behavior of the computer from “poked, waited, appeared” to “poked, appeared”. Psychological comfort it delivers fair. Plus, if users on computers are allowed a lot of things, then the admin needs to clean up so that it doesn’t completely slow down, and in the case of ssd, he will have to do this much less often, because. lags will be noticeable much later. From a truecrypt point of view, it also makes sense, containers on screws slow down much more than on ssd.
However, it all depends on the level of the firm. The usual average household computer is a core2duo with 2GB on XP and a 5400 screw. Since budgeting still decides.

Answer 10

I put a fast 60GB in my laptop, I saw a huge difference in windows performance, now I will put it on all the computers I have to deal with (home and office), on a laptop, most likely, I will replace it with 160, a little slower. The system response speed, program loading, etc. has increased very much, then I’ll probably get used to it, but so far there are very positive emotions from the work. An old laptop with a 32bit dual core and 3GB is faster than a Phenom home computer with 8GB (recently upgraded the disk subsystem, because Windows is new and clean, in case anyone thinks so).
In general, paired with a regular screw to speed up the work will be very useful for the speed of the system as a whole. Whether this is necessary is another question.