SSD mirror for 1C file base

X

xsash2013-12-26 07:53:26

RAID

xsash, 2013-12-26 07:53:26

At the moment, the server with SAS raid 10 can no longer cope with the load. The bottleneck was the file database.
Yes, of course, it would be worth thinking about translating the database into SQL ... But the directors think differently, so I have to look for alternative solutions.
What raid controller will be problem-free to a neighbor (raid 10) and be friends with two SSDs?
What SSD today (~ 64-128 giga) are the most adequate in terms of quality / price?

Reply

Answer the question

In order to leave comments, you need to log in

6 answer(s)

P

PuzzleW, 2014-02-27
@xsash

counters on a disk in system put? what's in them? where are the main delays?
What does Gilev's performance test say on your current hardware?
And, sorry for the question, if you have already encountered it :) when did you upload and download the last time?

S

s0n1q, 2014-01-10
@s0n1q

If there is an understanding that the bottleneck is the logic of the butt, then SSD drives may not save you. To begin with, I would look at how loaded the disks themselves are in the system, whether the RAID level is correctly selected for your type of load, and so on...

O

oia, 2013-12-26
@oia

there is not enough hardware specification that is available, the mother and the controller to understand what to advise

M

MadRat, 2014-12-30
@MadRat

What about a gigabit network? Cope with the load? What is the number of users per database?

D

Dmitry, 2014-02-12
@Spalf

The file base is still chasing the network, and the speed of its work is more likely to rest on the network and users' computers than on the disks on the server. To be honest, I have little idea what kind of base if SAS disks in 1 + 0 do not withstand the load.
Since the management does not agree on a 1C client-server, then look towards the terminal server.

T

Ta_Da, 2014-02-12
@Ta_Da

Two slightly naive questions:
What version of 1C (7 or 8)?
Are you sure that the bottleneck is the disk subsystem?