Answer the question
In order to leave comments, you need to log in
Why doesn't routing work for users in different vlans?
Hello, I have a config
Interface Ethernet1/0/21
switchport access vlan 200
!
Interface Ethernet1/0/22
description Asterisk
switchport access vlan 100
!
Interface Ethernet1/0/23
description Server#1
switchport mode trunk
!
Interface Ethernet1/0/24
description Server#2_port1
switchport access vlan 300
!
Interface Ethernet1/0/25
!
Interface Ethernet1/0/26
!
Interface Ethernet1/0/27
!
Interface Ethernet1/0/28
!
interface Vlan100
ip address 192.168.1.200 255.255.255.0
!
interface Vlan110
ip address 192.168.100.250 255.255.255.0
!
interface Vlan120
ip address 192.168.120.250 255.255.255.0
!
interface Vlan200
!
interface Vlan300
ip address 192.168.110.250 255.255.255.0
!
interface Vlan400
ip address 192.168.150.250 255.255.255.0
!
Answer the question
In order to leave comments, you need to log in
ACL??? permit any
as far as I remember, it is necessary that cisco also allowed circulation between vlans :) :)
xgu.ru/wiki/Cisco_ACL
If this is a switch that can route, since not everyone can, then by default it does not. The command is used to enable this ip routing
. Not a very new document but just for your question.
Firstly - what for do you prescribe route add on the switch - if all your networks sit on connected interfaces. The switch is already aware of what networks it has connected.
Secondly - where is default gw delivered on the client? On the switch interface or in Zimbabwe?
Thirdly - is ip routing enabled?
Fourth - what kind of switch?
Fifthly, there is no need to dig ACL - everything is allowed there when routing, unless of course you have already done it there, if you have done it - kill it and deal with routing first.
Didn't find what you were looking for?
Ask your questionAsk a Question
731 491 924 answers to any question