M
M
MrDZ2021-03-01 18:51:05
Computer networks
MrDZ, 2021-03-01 18:51:05

Why does stp block a port on one switch and not on another?

There is such scheme:
Two fortigate work in the ha ap mode. They work just like switches. For lan, I allocated two ports (hard switch). (there is a couple of vlan with dhcp server). Two hpe switches are connected to them. Ports on hpe are not aggregated, separate trunks. Stp is enabled everywhere. On one hpe switch, I observe that the port connected to fgt, which is slave - blocking; on the second, both ports are forwading. At the same time, on the second, when I connected the devices, I noticed that it did not receive an ip address until I disabled the port going to the slave. The essence of the question: how to properly configure them among themselves, what am I doing wrong? ))

I'm not trying to get a specific recipe, how to set it up, please give me a direction. It is not entirely clear how the switch will think which port to send data to when it is connected to a device operating in cluster mode. Do I need to include stp on fgt at all? If you need to show the settings for clarification - write which ones.

Answer the question

In order to leave comments, you need to log in

1 answer(s)
V
Valentin, 2021-03-02
@vvpoloskin

Collect first without a cluster for one fortingate, achieve correct work, and then with the second one, and investigate this issue (sniffer, STP status, presence of BPDU). As a rule, active-passive clusters operate in a mode where the passive box only forwards traffic, processing is carried out only on the active one. That is, passive is just additional ports. But FG may have something different.

Didn't find what you were looking for?

Ask your question

Ask a Question

731 491 924 answers to any question