A
A
Antonio2018-06-13 07:52:01
Career in IT
Antonio, 2018-06-13 07:52:01

Who is more independent - a developer or a tester?

Good afternoon!
Each profession is important in its own way. The value of a developer, as well as a tester, cannot be overestimated.
Everyone has their own nuances in the work. But who is more independent in terms of workflow and whose skills are most in demand?
If a developer loses his job, he can quickly find an application for his skills (fulfilling new orders, creating his own product and subsequent monetization). It is not easy for a tester to find orders for testing, because in our country, qa is not particularly valued. Product development can do without testing (at least in the early stages), and testing without development can't.
Perhaps this is just my personal opinion.
What do you think, comrades?

Answer the question

In order to leave comments, you need to log in

4 answer(s)
⚡ Kotobotov ⚡, 2018-06-13
@angrySCV

everything is simple:
without a tester, you can develop a product, but not without a developer.

S
Sergey Nizhny Novgorod, 2018-06-13
@Terras

1) A tester is an employee in the state or an employee in the state remotely. On Freelance, they won’t give you anything more complicated than orders to “pierce a site, look at errors, vulnerabilities”. For, small customers do not need testing, but large ones are already recruiting (NDA, familiarity with the system, etc.).
2) In the West, it is believed that the tester is a monkey, so they pay pennies. Real money comes when you become either a security officer or QA-Automation (and this is already knowledge of Java / Python + databases and other test frameworks).
3) Testing is a layer between PM and Development on more or less large projects. Actually, if this is not the case, then a layer in the form of a tester is not needed.
_____
In short, in testing, only leads, qa-automation, security people get good money - it takes 3-4 years of experience. Developers generally get higher, and there is always the opportunity to do something of their own. Those. be more profitable as a developer. The only question is that it is easier to enter testing, and you can always grow into a developer.

M
Maxim Fedorov, 2018-06-13
@Maksclub

The tester is the solution to SOME of the developer's problems.
Also, good developers are good at automated testing. In some teams there are no or almost no testers, where development goes through TDD.
But this should not affect the choice of work as a tester, if you like it - do it!

P
Puma Thailand, 2018-06-13
@opium

It is obvious that developers get much more and the need for them is also much greater.

Didn't find what you were looking for?

Ask your question

Ask a Question

731 491 924 answers to any question