Categories

JavaScriptPHPHTMLCssPythonWordPressWeb developmentLinuxMySQLAndroidWindowsJavaC++ / C#LayoutReactUbuntuYiiDjangoProgramming1C-BitrixLaravelSystem administrationTelegramJSONDebianPostgreSQLIOSGoogleHtaccessWindows ServerGitMacOSGoogle ChromeCMSWooСommerceBootstrapNginxSQLUnityAPI
Make a leaderReport
R
R
rad952019-10-04 18:58:03
Processors
rad95, 2019-10-04 18:58:03

Which is better: 2 cores 3.2Hz each or 4 cores 1.6Hz each?

Provided that in all other respects the processors are identical.

Reply
Answer the question

Answer the question

In order to leave comments, you need to log in

1 answer(s)
Report
F
Fixid, 2019-10-04
@rad95

Maybe you made a mistake in the description?
4 cores 3.2GHz is undeniably better

Similar questions
B
bb_CCC2016-02-22 09:32:56
People of what profession develop processors and their architecture? 4Reply
W
winz7772020-07-08 01:44:57
Brutal murder of integrated graphics Intel Iris Plus Graphics 640 glitch or reality? 1Reply
4
4aki72020-07-12 19:42:58
How will 3200 RAM work with a 2666 capable processor? 3Reply
M
mrbaranovskyi2020-07-13 17:24:36
Linus Torvalds and last comments about AVX-512? 2Reply
R
Rokis2018-07-30 21:32:22
Does xgboost algorithm work via cpu or gpu? 2Reply

Didn't find what you were looking for?

Ask your question

Ask a Question

731 491 924 answers to any question