Which hypervisor (virtualizer) to choose for 1C based on NVMe SSD?

Question

Solid State Drives

Greetings!
Please share your experience, which hypervisor to use on a new server under 1C? And how correctly it all works if you deploy everything on an NVMe SSD with backup on the HDD.

The old server runs on Citrix Xen Server, splitting the hardware into three virtual machines:
1. V-DB - SQL database,
2. V-APP - 1C
3. V-TS - terminal server for users who connect via RDP.
According to the same scheme, it is planned to configure a new server.

I would be grateful for examples of working schemes for 1C servers based on type 1 hypervisors.
Maybe there are already more reliable solutions?

Answer 1

I agree with my previous colleague! It is critical that SQL and 1C are on the same server; In this case, they will communicate using the Shared memory protocol; Otherwise, they will send each other data over the network;
The brakes will be wild.

Answer 2

which hypervisor to use

Any, but best of all the one that you know how to cook.
For example, I'm using KVM, and I'm Ok.

According to the same scheme, it is planned to configure a new server.

Well, in vain. It is better to combine the first and second machines.

Answer 3

Which hypervisor (virtualizer) to choose for 1C based on NVMe SSD?

The one you can work with.

Answer 4

You have Microsoft products so use hyper-v . It will be reasonable to use a brew if it is a corporate standard. Kvm well, purely for an amateur. Just do not complicate the infrastructure unnecessarily, there are enough firefights already

Answer 5

And I do not agree with the two previous colleagues. Not such a large amount of data is chasing between the 1C server and the database so that the network becomes the cause of the brakes. Of course, if the network is not 100 Mbps and is functioning normally. But the convenience of administration is much higher with two servers.
Regarding the question itself, they also answered above: take the one that you can confidently deal with in case of any problems. Since 99.9% of everything will be on Windows, then if USB forwarding is not important, then I would use Hyper-V in production. If only because of the price.

Answer 6

If you have only one piece of iron on which you need to place 3-4 1C bases and up to 30 users in RDP, then I see no reason to spread the school and 1C. The savings on using Shared Memory is small, but it is there, but there will be savings on the whole virtual machine, which will not have to be kept online, and resources will never be superfluous. A spare virtual machine with a separate 1C server can be kept turned off and used only when switching to a new platform for testing.
As for the platform, everyone said before me - any hypervisor that is faster and easier for you to raise and maintain. USB forwarding in extreme cases is solved by separate software, broken or inexpensive.