What's the point of using Adobe InDesign for website layouts?

Question

Adobe

What's the point of drawing a website layout in this program if it doesn't support raster graphics? Maybe I'm mistaken about the fact that it only works with vector? But if this is the case, then it is somehow strange to draw website layouts and illustrations for magazines, in an environment where full-fledged graphics are not supported.

Answer 1

Classics for the web designer are Photoshop and Illustrator - raster and vector. Both of these components allow you to implement a quality product, quickly, efficiently, conveniently! InDesign - the main purpose of layout for printing. Using InDesign to design web objects is quite normal, as there are also vector graphics and a lot of tools for alignment, grids, and other design work. Full graphics are supported everywhere, the question is what do you mean by full graphics? All of these editors have web conversion. And at the expense of using a raster, it's simply that high-quality photos are easily inserted and typeset already in these editors, like a substrate, like ready-made layouts. Screen resolutions of monitors, phones, tablets are growing,

Answer 2

Create layouts in a raster editor - the Middle Ages.

Answer 3

Are you confusing Illustrator with InDesign?
In both programs, you can safely link or plant a raster on the page. So there are no restrictions, except for crooked hands and not knowing the editor's environment.
And what do you mean by full graphics? The fact that you PS filled the gradient onto the layer and everything was displayed immediately in the layout? What then prevents you from working with raster files in PS, but at the same time linking them in Illustrator/InDesign/CorelDraw?
In short, the taste and color, as they say. Who is more comfortable.
Z.Y. Although in recent years, PS has acquired a fairly rich functionality and additional. website design tools. And if you know the tools, it's better to work in it.

Answer 4

Who is more comfortable.
And why are raster graphics "full" and vector graphics are not?

Answer 5

And why do raster graphics in the site layout at all?
Photoshop has long lagged behind the needs of the industry. In the era of responsive design, illustrator looks like a more flexible tool for working with the web.
People after 15 years of Photoshop say goodbye to it and are transplanted to other products from other companies.
Everyone works with the tool that is convenient for him, but making a website in indiz is still a perversion.

Answer 6

any adobe products can be used for web design if it's convenient
photoshop lustrator indez,
for example, I prefer to do everything lying on the couch on the ipad - and for this, the appropriate software is located or written

Answer 7

InDesign is convenient for creating layout layouts with ready-made materials. Actually, it was created for the layout of books, booklets, etc. But for websites in special cases, they can do the task.
I whitewash booklets at InDesign. It is good because it can not embed raster graphics into the file itself, but only link it - because the file is not so heavy, and slows down work with it. But when outputting, it can either embed already linked files into the final file, or put them side by side.
In any case, it is much more convenient than doing it in Photoshop.

Answer 8

Indesign for printing. Photoshop for retouching. Neither one nor the other does not meet the modern requirements of interface design. The only real editor is Adobe Comet adobe.ly/Comet But it's not out yet. Because while you can use Sketch.