Answer the question
In order to leave comments, you need to log in
What's the point of the new mac mini?
Old:
ark.intel.com/ru/products/64900/Intel-Core-i7-3615...
www.cpubenchmark.net/cpu.php?cpu=Intel+Core+i7-361...
New:
ark. intel.com/en/products/83506/Intel-Core-i7-4578...
www.cpubenchmark.net/cpu.php?cpu=Intel+Core+i7-457...
That is, the processor seems to have gotten worse , or I did not understand something?
On a video card, compared to hd4000, you still can’t play anything:
www.notebook-center.ru/video_463.html
I see only a plus in the fact that you can connect a third monik now. Maybe there is something else that I missed?
Answer the question
In order to leave comments, you need to log in
Well, the graphics have become a little more powerful ...
Oh, so, of course, the new mac-mini has become worse. There are also incomprehensible rumors about the fact that the memory may have been soldered. It will be a total fail.
We urgently need to buy up stocks with the 2012 model :)) We use the youngest of the 2012 models as a piece of hardware for developers. We achieve memory up to 16GB, we connect two monitors. A handy piece of hardware for both iOS and Android developers.
And in the new model, building an application (just the same, a multi-threaded task) is potentially twice as slow. Well, or due to faster cores, perhaps it will simply remain at the same level.
Author: You brought the wrong processor in the link to the new one. there i5, not i7
Yes, there are no special pluses, the younger model was generally spoiled, there are no percents about anything, what was the youngest became the middle model and rose in price by $ 100. The pluses are cosmetic, the Wi-Fi is better and the second bolt was added (why the hell if even through one 6 devices you can attach a chain). The only real improvement in the most expensive model is the PCI-E SSD screw, but at the price of this model, you can already look towards the MacBook Pro. Slightly less power consumption, which is generally sideways on a stationary model. In general, an update for the sake of an update is not a single serious improvement.
Well, there are twice as many cores, so, that is, on multi-threaded applications, you can get a performance increase close to two.
Didn't find what you were looking for?
Ask your questionAsk a Question
731 491 924 answers to any question