What do you think of today's $100 AMD processors?

Question

AMD

It's been 4 years since I bought a laptop with intel core i5. Here I thought about collecting a hospital, based on an AMD processor. Simply because in terms of performance / price - they are several times superior to intel. What about quality/price/performance? It is the processors that are on the shelves that are interesting, no bu five years ago. Budget around $100.
The request to answer those who had real experience.
Thanks to

Answer 1

I ran AMD with the Android SDK - the emulator really only works on Intel :-(

Answer 2

I'm waiting for Ryzen 5 for $180 (will be in April). So far, the cheapest Ryzen 7 is $330.
I will collect a micro desktop on it.
I decided on the rest and started buying

Answer 3

Before the release of budget Zen on AM4 - I would not think about AM3 | FM2. Some 7850K has good graphics (2 times better than Intel), but 4 cores are no better than 2 cores in Pentium G4400. And the G4560 with HT can handle any AMD, except for the top eight cores, in most tasks (except perhaps those that are specifically designed for multithreading and do not load the FPU).
...
All that AMD had before the Zen generation was technologies from five years ago, on the old 28 nm process technology, optimized for power and frequency potential: Bulldozer cores and GCN graphics. I'm telling you as an AMD fan who has assembled a lot of computers for himself and for people, for the time being forced to sit on the i5-7600 (before the release of the six-core ryzen 5)