Answer the question
In order to leave comments, you need to log in
Set up GVRP on QTECH QSW-3200/3900?
Hello dear.
We have a chain of QTECH QSW-3200, 3900 and 2900 switches. Naturally, every time we got tired of dragging vlans over them - it caught fire to raise GVRP. I do according to two official manuals (in principle the same), but so far unsuccessfully. At 2900, on the one hand, the vlan was created and is given unmarked to the client, on the other hand, at 3900, the vlan was also created statically and is given further by the trunk.
Start:
QSW-2900-switch1#sh vl 273
show VLAN information
VLAN name : Client
VLAN ID : 273
VLAN status : static
VLAN member : e0/24-e1/1.
Static tagged ports : e0/24-e1/1.
Static untagged Ports :
Dynamic tagged ports :
Total entries: 1 vlan.
QSW-2900-switch1#sh gvrp
GVRP status : enable
QSW-2900-switch1#sh garp permit vlan
VLAN 1 is Garp default permit VLAN
Other Garp permit VLAN:
273,278
QSW-2900-switch1#sh gvrp interface ethernet 1/1
port GVRP status
e1/1 enable
Total entries: 1.
QSW-3900-switch10#sh vl 273
show VLAN information
VLAN ID : 273
VLAN status : static
VLAN member : e0/0/1,e0/1/1.
Static tagged ports : e0/0/1,e0/1/1.
Static untagged Ports :
Dynamic tagged ports :
Total entries: 1 vlan.
QSW-3900-switch10#sh gvrp
GVRP status : enable
QSW-3900-switch1#sh gvrp inter eth 0/1/1
port GVRP status
e0/1/1 enable
Total entries: 1.
QSW-3900-switch10#sh garp permit vlan
VLAN 1 is Garp default permit VLAN
Other Garp permit VLAN:
273,278
QSW-3900-switch8# sh vl 273
show VLAN information
VLAN ID : 273
VLAN status : dynamic
VLAN member : e0/1/1.
Static tagged ports :
Static untagged Ports :
Dynamic tagged ports : e0/1/1.
QSW-3900-switch8#sh gvrp
GVRP status : enable
QSW-3900-switch8#sh gvrp inter eth 0/1/1 to ethernet 0/1/2
port GVRP status
e0/1/1 enable
e0/1/2 enable
Answer the question
In order to leave comments, you need to log in
If, by analogy with some other pieces of iron, VLAN must still be registered on intermediate switches, it is simply not displayed on ports. Could this be the problem?
PS if the network is large and confusing, it's better not to use GVRP - you risk catching rings.
Didn't find what you were looking for?
Ask your questionAsk a Question
731 491 924 answers to any question