No more than six hundred characters without a habrakat - is that enough?

Question

Habr

After the spring changes of 2012, you can publish without habrakat only such blog posts, the number of characters in which (including HTML code) does not exceed 600. Until this spring, this volume limit was more extensive.

Is it better that the feed gets mostly opening paragraphs rather than whole blog posts, so it's shorter and more visible?

Has it gotten worse because most blog posts can't be read in their entirety immediately in the feed, and each one has to be clicked and downloaded first, so you have to fiddle more?

Answer 1

IMHO it got better. In a tape I look at topics. I read the link even if the topic is short, because the comments are still interesting.

Answer 2

And I didn’t notice the difference =) Maybe everyone began to use habrakat seeing scraps at the end?

Answer 3

In a Google reader, you have to click on the “full text” button more often. And it's like it's invisible.