Nikon D3100 vs Pentax Kx?

Question

Cameras

Help them make a purchase.
On bourgeois forums they write that:
Pentax Kx:
- Super mega high-quality matrix
- cheap lens, that is, cheap optics (I didn’t notice something like that in online stores)
- stabilizer in the case and not in the
Nikon D3100 lens:
- FullHD video with 24 frames, with autofocus.
- Nikon will be much easier to sell
- The matrix is ​​\u200b\u200blarger than that of Kx
Budget up to 24990 re.
I welcome any comments and suggestions.

Answer 1

As you know, nikon is blue, canon is yellow, and pintax is shit .
Read what the owners of pentaxes themselves write about pentax.

Answer 2

1. matrices are the same in size (crop 1.5), and Nikon only has more small pixels (which, as you know, do not solve)
2. cheap optics for pentax? tell this to those who dream of lims, besides, more third-party lenses are produced for nikon (sigma, tamron ...)
3. the stub in the matrix is ​​​​good (as the owner of Sony I say, they also have a carcass inside), but if there is enough money for stabilized optics - This is even better.
4. Pentax has higher burst shooting, but Nikon has a higher exposure compensation range and LCD is cooler
, but in general, the cameras are close in terms of characteristics, come to the store, hold both in your hands. whichever fits better is yours :)

Answer 3

Here you need to choose a system. If you then abruptly want to expand the set of optics, buy a flash and so on, you may be surprised that the Canon, Nikon and Pentax systems are very different. By cheap optics from Pentax, I mean that Pentax has almost no bad optics. That is, roughly speaking, there is almost no budget segment of optics. All In addition, Pentax has excellent compatibility with old lenses. Nikon, on the other hand, has several budget lenses (for example, DX 35 \ 1.8), but everything at a higher level already costs sky-high money.
Total, pentax k-x:
- a stabilizer for any optics, even for Helios 44-2 excavated in a closet;
- AA batteries or AA batteries;
- sometimes not very fast and accurate autofocus (but I honestly don’t use nikon);
- work with any optics ever produced by Pentax with the maximum possible set of functions.
Nikon 3100:
- there should be normal autofocus from nikon;
- a good choice of optics fleet, with one exception that non-AF-S optics will not have autofocus, and non-budget optics cost simply astronomical money;
- the best choice of external flashes among all brands;
- the autofocus function in the video, which, it should be noted, is rather useless in real life.
Talking about colors, and so on, I think it's useless. How many people, so many opinions. In addition, RAW processing can easily equalize the chances of shots.
On my own, I’ll just add that, having taken pentax kx in due time, I fell in love with him. Yes, he has his flaws, but they are usually visible in comparison with the top carcasses of other brands, while within the same field everything is more than normal. And yes, read the Pentax Club, there are a lot of good and interesting people who can give a lot of information for thought.

Answer 4

As the owner of a Sony A700 with a stabilizer in the carcass - I will say - this is very good. Of course, it depends on what you are shooting, but shooting in the evening / at night greatly benefits from this.

Answer 5

Choose glass, and then the carcass. Budget carcasses are all about the same.

Answer 6

Definitely Nikon. At the very 3100. The quality of the photographs is outrageous. The optics are cheaper (for example, 35 / 1.8 I have an excellent working glass), the colors are better, the attitude will be different. And grow up - take a serious optics.