Answer the question
In order to leave comments, you need to log in
Legality of using "modified" software based on 1C
Given: 3 accounting computers. XP, 1C 7.7, third-party development bases ("Construction Contractor"). Everything except the first item is officially purchased. The databases are protected by Katran keys, which I could not tie to Ubuntu. However, it is possible to tear off the protection of the configuration from the keys, and then all this economy works great under Ubuntu as well.
Question: How legitimate is it to use such a solution with documents confirming the purchase of this configuration? (from a legal point of view)
Answer the question
In order to leave comments, you need to log in
Article 1280. Free reproduction of computer programs and databases. Decompilation of computer programs
1. A person lawfully in possession of a copy of a computer program or a copy of a database (user) has the right, without the permission of the author or other right holder and without paying additional remuneration:
1) to make changes to the computer program or database solely for the purpose of their functioning on the technical means of the user and to carry out the actions necessary for the functioning of such a program or database in accordance with their purpose, including recording and storing in the memory of a computer (one computer or one network user), as well as correcting obvious errors, if otherwise not provided for by an agreement with the copyright holder;
The most important thing is the documents in the accounting department about the purchase of software.
The law was brought to you, i.e. in theory you can, in practice - hack a binary, leave the keys stuck in computers, about the fact that you patched something there - like a fish on ice
just recently I asked the office that oversees us for 1s (we have both 7.7 and 8.1 / 8.2)
sash (00:13:14 10/15/2010)
and if there is no LPT, is it allowed to use an emulator and dump the original key?
purely academic interest
[1c] Alexander (00:14:46 10/15/2010)
legally - not allowed
in theory
[1c] Alexander (00:15:23 10/15/2010)
in fact - depending on which court, which lawyer which judge
has precedents in both favors
1C at one time allowed the use of emulators with a purchased license and in cases where the use of hardware keys is technically not possible. Maybe something has changed now. But this was a 1C position that reviewers may not share. Try to contact 1C directly, and not to a partner.
Didn't find what you were looking for?
Ask your questionAsk a Question
731 491 924 answers to any question