Is higher education necessary?

Question

IT education

Hello. Habr, help me.
I don't want to get higher education, because. I think that I will achieve more by self-education, I think that full-time study has not yet gone anywhere, where a person receives part of the knowledge he needs for his future career, teaches him to study, increases his life experience, etc. Some of my friends think the same, some differently.
I have already quarreled with my parents, who stubbornly, with screams and terrible quarrels, repeat that in our world higher education is very good, that without it you will work all your life at your current job (sys. admin, 12 thousand / month. , outback) and they won’t take you anywhere else.
Actually, because of them, for the sake of appearances, I submitted documents to the local sharaga, for correspondence, where I should be enrolled soon. I understand very well that I don’t want to waste time, money, nerves on something that I don’t need, or do I need?
I very much ask for advice from people with experience, career and life. Is it necessary?

Ask questions if so.

Answer 1

System administrator without work experience (just kidding, with experience as a system administrator with a salary of 12 thousand rubles) without higher education, 25 years old looking for a job. Fine?
The deepest delusion of all of you who are violently against entering the university is that you think that the university teaches you a specialty.
This is not true. The university will teach you a systematic approach. That is why I agree with our rector that much more valuable experience at the end is received not by excellent students, but by three students who have reached the window and did not fly out. Because it gives a systematic approach, a kind of strength test.
And here I consider correspondence students / entering a dull sharaga on a level with those who did not study at all. So decide for yourself.
PS Personally, I do not consider resumes of part-time students or persons without V / O when applying for a job. Because no matter what you say about the knowledge that is given at the university (I completely agree with you, they can rarely be applied in practice), but the main factor is stupid laziness, and we don’t need lazy people.

Answer 2

fir1st, Well, how much can you ask the same question?
Re-read the answers in the Yandex cache to your previous question: hghltd.yandex.net/yandbtm?text=ooprizrakoo%20%D0%B2%D1%8B%D1%88%D0%BA%D0%B0&url=http%3A%2F% 2Fhabrahabr.ru%2Fqa%2F20708%2F&fmode=inject&mime=html&l10n=ru&sign=6f41517edb58fe36a7cbc0ae41d81b45&keyno=0
Or do you think that one of the commentators will give an answer that will then allow you to shift the responsibility for your choice to another person? (like - "I was advised so in the IT community."

Answer 3

You can also use the search, for example, read this question .

Answer 4

All other things being equal, preference will be given to a specialist with a higher education.

Answer 5

Guys, don't you think the situation is very simple. The Microsoft founder left the university because he needed time to run his company. If you have neither a company nor a clear path where to go, then do not "force" your brain. Go study.
A salary of 12,000 rubles is certainly not worth the lost education. Yes, and in 30-40 it is the same.

Answer 6

A good education never hurts, I emphasize - good.
In Russia, these are just a few universities, among which I will single out the Moscow Institute of Physics and Technology, Moscow State University and the Bauman University.
I have a degree in Physics and Mathematics from a local university. Everything I know in IT, I studied myself, while studying at the university,
but no one can make this choice for you

Answer 7

It is necessary to study, but even more not to obtain some specific knowledge, but to train the brain. They didn’t really teach me anything either at school or at the university, everything that I now use in everyday life came with experience, but still it won’t hurt to get some kind of crust. Some large companies also don’t take it without a crust ... The
correspondence option is a good choice, you can calmly hand over everything without straining and get your crust. The main thing is not to run! The options that I don’t have time for anything don’t pass, almost all of my friends worked during the training and nothing - they managed everything.

Answer 8

I don’t have a higher education (although I could have - I came from the army with a recommendation to the institute) and so far the only reason I regretted it is because it is easier to go abroad with a higher education. And even then - at the age of twenty I did not even imagine that I would be a programmer, so if I went to a university, it would not be the one I really need.
Now, if I was twenty, I would only think about higher education if it was a Western university. Or, as an option - is there a correspondence course at the Faculty of Foreign Languages? Get two languages, plus train in Western literature, all around benefits.

Answer 9

In short, you don't need a higher education to work in IT. But education in another specialty will be useful: mathematics, economics, law, business, foreign languages.

Answer 10

A crust is not needed, knowledge is needed. Self-education will achieve, but longer than with teachers. Although full-time is certainly the best.

Answer 11

I studied only for the crust and a little for the awareness of life. And therefore, I think that there is no point in studying in sharaga (I graduated from ITMO). Well, it’s easy for me to talk, I live in St. Petersburg and I had the knowledge for admission, so I didn’t need any special gestures, except to fly out) ...

Answer 12

habrahabr.ru/post/141916/

Answer 13

I don’t know if it’s necessary or not, and I’m a web programmer, not a system administrator, but I think it won’t be superfluous. I myself am now entering a part-time program, stupidly for the sake of a crust, I don’t even think that they will teach at least something there. Well, purely in theory, it makes it easier to move over the hill, opens up the possibility of entering a foreign magistracy and all that.

Answer 14

For the horizon. Although, for example, it is too late to learn Russian at a university. “I don’t want”, “they also think”, fi. You should know at least one natural language well. But, perhaps, at least you will improve the style on the abstracts. It won't be redundant.
…Many employers with inertia thinking are still looking at formal education, sometimes with disastrous results. So, we recently had an employee with a programmer diploma, but without even an idea of ​​​​the basic syntax of at least any programming or markup language.

Answer 15

The question, of course, is very interesting… higher education probably doesn’t exist just like that – there is a need for it. But that’s why it’s higher, that those who don’t want to jump high may not jump - someone also needs to dig potatoes. So make up your mind - you want to fly high - enroll in a full-time at a good university and you will not regret it. If you don’t want to, system administrators for 12tyr are also needed. The choice is yours.

Answer 16

IMHO, higher education is strictly necessary for everyone who plans to send resumes to websites, look for vacancies, etc. when looking for a job.
If you are sure that headhunters will offer you a job anyway for your talents and achievements, then fuck with him, with education. But if there is the slightest doubt that they will try to get you in a good place, then it is better to have a diploma in your wallet, at least some. It is possible from the Agricultural Academy, for example, or something else that is not specialized, but to have.
If you still have a lot of doubts, try a simple trick.
Write your resume for +5 years in advance in the case of higher education and without it. Think about what technologies you will master in the next couple of years (leave the other 3 years for work / school / family and failed ventures) and add them to your resume along with an honest forecast of work experience (more modest here).
Then put both resumes on one site and wait - what will be the results on them.
Of course, you can view the vacancies on the sites yourself and calculate the number of suitable and average salaries for two resume options. Or even figure out how much one is better than the other.
Higher education, IMHO, is like a life buoy or a vest - it’s certainly easier to stay afloat with it, and it often won’t let you drown. But if you think that you will swim to the jelly shores anyway, like a professional swimmer, then the vest / circle will only slow you down (but note that they will slow down, it doesn’t mean that they will prevent you from reaching your goal. Even an overexperienced specialist will not interfere with higher education, it can only slow him down in early development).

Answer 17

In addition to the inscription in the resume (which is often filtered by the same employers when considering the flow of candidates), higher education (if, again, not obtained for a crust), teaches to learn - that is, to receive, analyze and systematize knowledge, and the experience of the same exams teaches present the acquired knowledge to others (examiners) in an accessible form. As already mentioned, the right education allows you to learn systemic thinking and analysis.
So my advice is to enroll at least in the evening (part-time) department - and it will not interfere with work, and instill discipline (you still need to go to lectures in the evenings), and will allow you to communicate with teachers, expand the same contacts.

Answer 18

In my opinion, the main problem in the selection of IT workers is not the issue of higher education.
Who usually looks at your resume first?
That's right, in 90% of cases - an HR worker for whom your skills are "dark forest".
The look after the date of birth goes to the “education” column, so what?
Sees the lack of higher education.
Further, the HR worker will be simply too lazy (do you think they are straining in the search for candidates?)
to figure out if you are suitable or not suitable for the vacancy you need.
The resume honestly goes to the shredder. Next..:).
I’m not ready to say that this is a 100% scenario, but in large organizations, in my opinion, this is exactly what happens.
And “necessary - not necessary”, this is your personal choice ...

Answer 19

Do not confuse a diploma and higher education.
Why a diploma is not needed (specific reasons):
www.youtube.com/watch?v=G1S5AQFyDD4&list=PL87kYOx0...
The question about the tower is more complicated
https://youtu.be/5XaHrVx9nmg

Answer 20

I don't know what you mean by "sharaga", but you don't seem to like this place very much. I would advise you to study at a university that you like. Try to find such a place.
And you don't have to waste your nerves. Just calmly learn how to do it. Treat it not as a duty or obligation, but as an opportunity to gain new experience. It expands consciousness. And for this it is better to study full-time for at least a couple of years. And the work will not go anywhere, you still have to work for a long time later. Yes, you can combine.

Answer 21

It's not so much as a specialist (it's clear that everyone can learn for himself), but in legal, bureaucratic and other social problems. Especially if there is a prospect abroad. Moreover, full-time education is not limited to obtaining professional knowledge, it is also, as a rule, a rather bright and interesting period in life, after which valuable experience and many useful contacts remain. My opinion is that if the financial situation allows, it is better not to miss the tower.

Answer 22

my brain was mocked for many years at the institute, they gave me little practical knowledge, but that volume of the base: matan, physics, microelectronics, etc., developed the ability to learn and systematize the information received in the strongest way.
Not all universities teach this way, but they taught me in mine. And only then it was much easier to learn practical things yourself. And then leave the country...