Image hosting powerful enough to withstand Habraeffect?

S

SeiFeR2012-10-06 06:44:37

Photo hosting

SeiFeR, 2012-10-06 06:44:37

I'm interested in a hosting that can handle 10,000 views per hour via direct-links.

Habrastorage is not suitable due to the fact that it automatically clamps photos up to 800PX in width. We need an option of at least 1600PX in width.

Thank you for your attention.

Reply

Answer the question

In order to leave comments, you need to log in

11 answer(s)

A

Andrew, 2012-10-06
@dasty

In contact with

A

Antelle, 2012-10-06
@Antelle

Yandex.photos, flickr.
I saw that there were pictures from there, that is, they don’t seem to block traffic for traffic. And the fact that they will endure is understandable.

N

norlin, 2012-10-06
@norlin

Yandex.Photos!

V

varg242, 2012-10-06
@varg242

Habrastorage .

P

pomeo, 2012-10-06
@pomeo

I put it on github github.com/pomeo/img.sovechkin.com

E

EugeneOZ, 2012-10-06
@EugeneOZ

imageshack.us

N

norlin, 2012-10-06
@norlin

And you could also try an extremist option - encode in base64 and insert directly, if Habr did not insert the “http://” prefix into each src

B

budulay, 2012-10-06
@budulay

Selectel Cloud Storage

A

Artur Smirnov, 2012-10-06
@wisd

If you want to use such pictures in an article or some document, you can simply split them into several and publish them side by side inline…

R

Ruslan Leviev, 2012-10-06
@ruskar

I use imgur.com

P

petrov_z, 2014-12-27
@petrov_z

ipev.ru try fresh