G
G
glassmonk2020-03-29 23:33:03
Computer networks
glassmonk, 2020-03-29 23:33:03

How to effectively organize WIFI in an apartment?

Good day. There is a 4-room apartment with concrete walls under 80 sq.m. It is necessary that all rooms have a stable signal and maximum speed. There is a TV in a large room, behind which a router and a TV set-top box are attached. The router is from the provider, but, theoretically, you can take your own. Even with this arrangement in the same room, the signal drops by a third (TV shields, because if the router is pulled out from behind the TV set, the signal level rises), in other rooms it is lower than desired + in the farthest laptop it still somehow catches, phones do not see at all. There is a second router from Xiaomi, which serves as a repeater, but the devices manage to catch a signal from the repeater, being under the nose of the head router, respectively, the speed is several times lower. You can switch hands, but it's hemorrhoids, tired. I thought about the mesh system, but the price and the fact confuse that in the apartment in each room there are already 2-4 ethernet outputs. Does it make sense to spend money on a mesh system if there is such a layout? If not, how to properly organize a seamless wifi network without speed loss? Thank you.

Answer the question

In order to leave comments, you need to log in

9 answer(s)
I
Ilya Efimov, 2020-03-30
@A_M

Everything that can be done by wire, done by wire.
Of the "seamless out of the box" solutions, I was pleased with Keenetic Ultra. He and a dual-band mesh can, and r/v/k will start out of the box.

K
Konstantin Frolov, 2020-03-30
@nitro80

take 1 Mikrotik with ports that support PoE, feed each ethernet cable to the rooms, and connect Mikrotik mAP lite to network sockets
configure caps

M
metajiji, 2020-03-30
@metajiji

Any network starts with planning. For wifi, the Ekahau Site survey proved to be excellent. We draw all the walls, doors, windows, specify the material. We press auto-planning, look at the result, pay attention to the network capacity, snr, interference.
We adhere to simple logic, lower power, more points (if we want to maintain quality and maximum clients, for large office networks no more than 30-50 clients per 1 point).
For a home, you will most likely need 2 access points, pay attention to whether there will be a TV or similar device with a stream, if so, then there is a lot of noise from it on the air, choose a channel away from your neighbors so that they do not interfere and so that they do not interfere with you (when manually selecting a channel, you will periodically have to scan the air in case new neighbors appear)
On Android WiFi Analyzer. Before starting, scan the air and make sure that the access point has correctly selected channels. For 2.4 GHZ it is 1, 6, 11.

D
Dimonchik, 2020-03-29
@dimonchik2013

simple:
https://store.google.com/us/product/nest_wifi?hl=en-US
cheap - you can get confused with Xiaomi,
but 4k TV on Wi-Fi is such a pleasure, gbps is better

D
Denver2000, 2020-03-30
@Denver2000

We take a router (to which we connect a cable with the Internet)
We make settings in it:
Create a connection with me, for example, ppoe.
enable DHCP with IP addresses 192.168.1.5 to 192.168.1.250
WLAN set name, password and auto channel number.
on the second router.
We create a network name and encryption type and channel number (auto) the same as on the first one.
DHCP - DISABLE. In the Lan IP section, set the address 192.168.1.4
If there is a third router, we also make the settings as on the second one, just change lan IP to 192.168.1.3
Everything will work both on wi-fi and on Ethernet.

M
mihailspesivcev, 2020-03-30
@mihailspesivcev

I can be very wrong, but I don’t see any problems, I have 3 rooms and stable wi-fi right up to the parking lot, a router for a hundred bucks solves all problems, before there was a router for 20 bucks and, of course, he was not capable of this and close.

A
Alexander, 2020-03-31
@Konagas

I think that you need to spend your money and opportunities only once ... Buy a normal Cisco second level switch and spread access points with different networks around the apartment. 4 rooms - 4 wireless networks with different names, and what can be connected via cable connected via cable ... It will be easier ... More precisely, more reliable ... We tried ... We know ...

G
glassMonk, 2020-04-01
@glassMonk

In short, I thought for a long time and bought a Zyxel Multy X + Multy Mini mesh system (it is sold in such a set). The main one is stable - "X", connected via cable, mini - an access point that expands coverage (wifi / ethernet). I don’t know what they did there, but with a minimum of necessary clicks, I got a completely seamless wifi space throughout the apartment at a speed of 70-95 Mbps with a package of "up to 100". And I tried both a wifi connection between devices, and I connected it via a mini wire - no differences. Moreover, when you try to move the access point from the farthest room closer, the application screams take it further, dragged it too close. I thought I would need two points, but for 80 sq. m. this is enough with the head. There are generally 418 sq.m. declared. The TV set-top box stands next to the router and connects to it via cable, everything works. The issue price is 249€. In principle, there is an even cheaper option - Zyxel Multy U (2 pieces - 200 €, three - 300). Also sold in sets of two to three devices. You can get acquainted with the characteristics on the official website and compare everything. Zyxel took it because of the suitable design (from competitors basically a tower-type solution), a user-friendly application through which everything is controlled and according to the results of tests on the network and reviews. So far I’m satisfied. If anything changes, I’ll unsubscribe. rental router provider. Zyxel took it because of a suitable design (competitors mainly have tower-type solutions), a user-friendly application through which everything is controlled, and based on the results of tests on the network and reviews. While satisfied. If anything changes, I'll post. In short, I recommend. By the way, in less than a year I will beat off the cost of the system by refusing to rent a provider's router. Zyxel took it because of a suitable design (competitors mainly have tower-type solutions), a user-friendly application through which everything is controlled, and based on the results of tests on the network and reviews. While satisfied. If anything changes, I'll post. In short, I recommend. By the way, in less than a year I will beat off the cost of the system by refusing to rent a provider's router.

Didn't find what you were looking for?

Ask your question

Ask a Question

731 491 924 answers to any question