Flash choice: Sigma EF-530 DG Super vs. Canon Speedlite 580EX II

Question

Photo

Hello. Now I'm preoccupied with buying a flash for amateur photography.

Among the candidates there are 2:
Sigma EF-530 DG Super
Guide number: 53
Zoom: yes
Rotate vertically (down/up), degrees: 7/90
Rotate horizontally (left/right), degrees: 180/90
Work as a leader : yes
Work as a slave: yes
Price: $250

Canon Speedlite 580EX II Guide
number: 58
Zoom: yes
Zoom range: 24-105 (14mm with wide-angle lens)
Vertical rotation (up/down), degrees: 7/90
Horizontal rotation (left / right), degrees: 180/180
Work as a leader: yes
Work as a wingman: yes
Price: $510

Features are very similar.
Familiar photographers recommend taking Canon, but somehow not very well reasoned. A question for those who have had the experience of "communication" with both:
is Canon so cool that it costs 2 times more? Should I take Sigma? Does she have any significant jambs, which I later may greatly regret? Can Sigma work in tandem with flashes from other manufacturers?

Answer 1

I would recommend the site market.yandex.ru - there are reviews of different outbreaks.
Read and compare.
Take a closer look at Nikon flashes, although not all of them are on display in the Yandex market.

Answer 2

Are you doing it professionally? If not + as I understand the financial issue is important for you, then take Sigma without hesitation.
If it brings some income or you are photographing in a studio, then native Canon puff, of course, would be preferable. And faster and better synchronization, build quality again.
I chose between 430 II / 580 II. Took 430 as puff needs are not that big. I don’t like the studio, I don’t need the extra 30% of the weight, the reload speed of 430 suited me.
So I think you first need to decide for what purpose you need puff.

Answer 3

if you are not shooting a reportage, if you understand how it all works and can work with a flash in manual mode, then you can get by with sigma. as a light source, sigma is quite a normal device, but as a device that you have to use, it certainly has some roughness.
for branded flashes, zooming is done by rearranging the mirror reflector with a slight movement of the lamp, for sigma, the zoom is performed by moving the lamp deep into the head, it takes time and emits a loud ZZhZhZhZhh
for me, this is the main disadvantage of sigma. in general, I think that the older SUPER sigmas have become too expensive, it’s easier to buy the 430th and shoot without thinking about anything

Answer 4

I thought about buying 580, but you puzzled me.
Write here (or in inbox) later, if it's not difficult, what you decided to choose and why, in a nutshell.

Answer 5

Sigma, in theory, should not be able to auto-zoom when zooming with a lens, i.e. does not know how to communicate with the lens - there are closed protocols, in theory ...
True, the auto-zoom of the flash only works at a position of 90 degrees, the slightest deviation of the head and it turns off.

Answer 6

If you do not use it in a pile with others (as a leader), then an excellent alternative for your money is 430EX II
The price of sigma is suspiciously low, something will not work.
PS The best solution is to come to the store and try everything yourself and choose on the spot.

Answer 7

By the way, what exactly will the flash be used for? For example, YongNuo is also suitable for strobism, which is much cheaper.

Answer 8

Worked with these and many others.
If you need high puff speed, specialized features (for example, Canon flash synchronization) and maximum ease of control - 580II, if not - you can consider 530 super

Answer 9

As I understand it, the author made his choice and settled on his native 430th.
As a comment for those interested. Sigma extracts the data exchange protocol between the camera and the flash by reverse engineering and is not always successful and 100%, so there may be compatibility problems, and the quality is somewhat worse. In addition, not all features of branded flashes are supported.
Alternatively, you can turn your attention to Metz flashes - a long-standing and well-deserved player in this market

Answer 10

I’ll also add that the 530 sigma, unlike the 500th series, requires selection from copies, or dragging it to the service for adjustment - one can underlight, the second can overlight ...

Answer 11

it is better to ask such questions on specialized sites, right now you will be advised

Answer 12

The big plus of sigma is that it has a light trap, i.e. it can be mounted on a tripod separately from the camera and fired with the camera's built-in flash. Canon does not know how, unfortunately, for kenon you need to buy special equipment to remotely control the flash.
And so, of course, canon will be more comfortable if you shoot a reportage or a wedding, then canon is preferable, if the speed of setting the light is not so critical, then sigma is also possible.
At one time, I first took sigma, then I bought 580.

Answer 13

If you don't find a 430 II for sale, take a look at a used 580 II.