Answer the question
In order to leave comments, you need to log in
Do you need Storage Spaces in a small system?
A server is planned for 50 terminal users and a medium-sized 1C file base. Selected iron DELL R710. The main work of users is browsers, 1C, instant messengers and file storage (sales managers). The base system will be Windows Server 2012, possibly HV.
The client suggests using 2xHDD in the mirror + 1xSSD for cache, I suggest using 2xHDD in the mirror + 2xSSD in the mirror. OS and DB on SSD, the rest on HDD.
Link to SS test charts, but I think it's wrong to compare large arrays of 12 HDDs with the current situation.
www.truesystem.ru/solutions/khranenie_danny/360884
Does anyone have experience or any thoughts on the topic?
Answer the question
In order to leave comments, you need to log in
Please note that it is not possible to install or download Windows from the Storage Spaces pool (at least on Windows Server 2012/2012R2).
If the performance of the HDD is sufficient for the tasks that will be assigned to them, this is the most economical option. To use SS, you will need a separate disk / array of disks under the OS.
Tiered Storage Spaces requires a minimum of 2 SSDs if you plan to somehow protect against drive failures. With a single SSD, you can only create a Simple Pool (similar to RAID0 / JBOD).
With the performance of tiered Storage Spaces, everything is very good: all recording always goes to SSD, reading comes from where it comes from. By default, SS optimization (moving hot/cold data to the corresponding tiers) is performed once a day, but you can also start it manually with the command
Get-ScheduledTask -TaskName "Storage Tiers Optimization" | Start-ScheduledTask
A server is planned for 50 terminal users and a medium-sized 1C file baseFilebase for 50 users? Are you joking? Or will two or three people work with her?
Didn't find what you were looking for?
Ask your questionAsk a Question
731 491 924 answers to any question