Answer the question
In order to leave comments, you need to log in
Do I need to google if I hit a dead end in a task?
Hello everyone, I have a question. It happens that you solve a problem - but you can’t find the answer for 15 minutes, then 30 minutes, after 2 hours. This happens when there is a lack of knowledge to solve this problem - here you need to google, I think without a twinge of conscience. And what to do when - most likely there is knowledge, but it’s not possible to destructure the task correctly, therefore, to apply the knowledge necessary to solve the problem, too, is it good form to immediately go to Google to solve the problem? Or is it a dead end, and you need to break your brains to become a good programmer? I heard that many people have a negative attitude to this, and they say that you need to strain your brains without attracting "information" from the outside.
For example, this happens to me when I have to go to Google, and the solution was on the surface. As a result, the task was solved anyway, but in the first case, a conditional 2 hours were spent on it without Google, and in the second, 1 minute.
Where to look for profit? Will Google put aside experience and target knowledge, or will the programmer have to suffer in search of an answer?
Answer the question
In order to leave comments, you need to log in
I heard that many people have a negative attitude to this, and they say that you need to strain your brains without attracting "information" from the outside.
Didn't find what you were looking for?
Ask your questionAsk a Question
731 491 924 answers to any question