O
O
Oleg Kalensky2016-12-12 09:48:22
RAID
Oleg Kalensky, 2016-12-12 09:48:22

Do I need a separate SSD for SQL?

We are assembling a server on which there will be a 1C + SQL machine in the hypervisor. Specifically for this couple, there will be RAID 10 with SSDs, which, according to the calculator, give about 200k IOPS (4x Samsung 950 Pro 512Gb). The question is, do you still need to split the log file and data file on different disks, or can you leave everything together on one array?
Thank you in advance.

Answer the question

In order to leave comments, you need to log in

3 answer(s)
R
Roman Mindlin, 2016-12-12
@kgbplus

And I'll add one more. Just last month we went through a similar situation - we got a request that runs on our server for a very long time, 15 seconds. Installing an SSD and transferring the base to it gave an acceleration of about 0.5 seconds. Query optimization, by simply transferring the nested query to a temporary table, reduced the query execution time to 1 second (i.e., 15 times). This is me to the fact that the SSD itself will not solve all the problems.
PS: And yes, of course, it’s right to keep the logs on a regular disk (and in general, decide why you need such a recovery model if everything is on raid 10), and don’t forget to transfer tempdb to the SSD.

Didn't find what you were looking for?

Ask your question

Ask a Question

731 491 924 answers to any question