A
A
Artur Ivashko2018-03-14 17:21:31
Monitors
Artur Ivashko, 2018-03-14 17:21:31

Cheap 27"-32" monitor with good color reproduction?

Hi all. Please tell me a monitor from 27 to 32 inches, cheap, with high color reproduction (RGB coverage 99-100%). QHD resolution, I don’t need 4K, 16:9/10 is not 21:9, and if there are such on the market or were with an IPS matrix. If someone asked the same question and bought something, tell us about your device, what difficulties did you encounter, is it difficult for him to work for 12-15 hours? Glad for all answers.

Answer the question

In order to leave comments, you need to log in

3 answer(s)
M
Mikhail Osher, 2018-03-14
@miraage

It doesn’t fit into the frame 27-32, but it’s damn cheap and, in my opinion, conveys colors well (I compare it with MBP Retina).
24 inches, 16:10.
DELL U2412M

A
Astrohas, 2018-03-14
@Astrohas

Monitor Iiyama ProLite X3272UHS-B1 32" 3840 x 2160
Iiyama ProLite XUB2792QSU-1 27' 2560-1440

S
sir_Maverick, 2018-03-28
@sir_Maverick

If it's still relevant, I took a monitor this year, I was looking for just 32 "QHD, because of the large pixel, because I'm completely deprived of vision. Initially, the choice fell on Iiyama ProLite XB2483HSU-B3? with a 90-degree rotation, MVA matrix, FullHD. Monitor I didn’t like it because there were color distortions in portrait mode, which was not in horizontal mode. But the pixel was comfortable, so in the end I handed over the monitor and took a Samsung S32D850T 32 "qHD with the same pixel size. Initially aiming at 27 qHD, but it was vision that played a key role in the choice. Samsung has an MVA (in some places they write AMVA) matrix, a swivel mechanism and height adjustment. There is no distortion in portrait mode. Plus, the second monitor can be taken just 23.8 "- 24" with FullHD or 1920x1200, the pixel size will be the same.
Samsung took for 27 thousand, not the cheapest, but not the most expensive option either. The type of matrix is ​​the same as that of the former Iiyama, but subjectively the quality is much higher. In general, I advise you to go shopping and see firsthand the image quality of the specimen of interest.
It is not difficult to work, it fits a lot more information, it was difficult to get used to the huge workspace, but the studio fits more necessary windows and panels, while expanding the code editor window to its full height and a little more than half the width of the screen.
The only negative is that before that there was an old Samsung SinkMaster, he worked for 15 years, and until his death he was strong as a brick. When buying this monitor, I counted on 10 years of work, but after looking at the build quality, I began to doubt - the panels fit unevenly, creaks, and trembles when the table shakes. But this does not affect the quality of the monitor, of course.

Didn't find what you were looking for?

Ask your question

Ask a Question

731 491 924 answers to any question