Why such different SMART results for HDD?

Question

Hard disks

Actually why SeaTools says that everything is ok with smart. and other utilities swear? who to believe?

Answer 1

As far as I remember, SeaTools has a DOS version and it has an extended test. Should give the full result. In any case, the railway is in a guarantee or a trash can.

Answer 2

because someone sewed into the utility that a bad value is one, and another in another utility.

Answer 3

Do a full surface check, it will show the real state of things.
Smart in Seatools swears when the worst value is less than the threshold, usually then it's too late.
The rest of the programs start to panic when the RSC parameter starts to decrease, and they do it right in my opinion.

Answer 4

RAW value of SMART Reallocated Sector 593. That is, the figure speaks for itself. There are reassigned sectors. You can google how bad it is, but the data obviously needs to be saved. It's not even an hour .. Now infa is more expensive than iron, however, it's up to you. There is a chance that it will work, but there is also a chance that it will fly further.

Answer 5

Seatools does not swear at already reassigned sectors. Therefore, in the context of testing drives, it is better not to use it. RAW smart values ​​will be more reliable.

Answer 6

What is so special about it??
I use darsa.in/sly/examples/horizontal.html myself (I like performance).