Why is it necessary to pay money for viewing an HR resume, and vice versa on freelance exchanges?

Question

Career in IT

Good day. There are much fewer offers on IT job search sites than those who want to get this job, but why do recruiters need to pay a certain amount for viewing resumes, while on the freelance exchange, on the contrary, the contractor pays?

Answer 1

On the exchange, the buyer is the contractor, and on job search sites, the employer is.
The exchange does not search for performers. These are advertising services at maximum speed with onerous conditions. Who will be the performer is not important at all, his identity should be hidden, because only the owner should see his passport. The executors of the host must obey and speak with the guest of the Exchange as the host says and keep their heads prostrate. For extra words, the owner punishes, up to pasture in the cold without the right to return. When executing an order from a guest, the performer undertakes to pay tribute on income. In some exchanges there is also a quitrent once a month. Each host keeps a record of the best performers. The funny thing is that these stars do not give anything when you exit this exchange. Having completed St. George's Day, the performer will have to start all over again, because there is no way to call you. After all, inside any exchange, your personality is not.
On job search sites, the opposite is true. Each performer is a free person, and free people have rights and property. They are already worth some money. In this case, the asset is the experience in the real world. Suppose if you work as a driver on the stock exchange, this is one thing, then you are a white person, and if you are a performer on the stock exchange, it is empty, like a bang from a cork when opening champagne.
Free people do not depend on employers and, accordingly, it is more difficult to attract their attention. To attract the attention of such a person, you need to share some gold. Whoever has more gold has more choice and can choose a suitable candidate for himself.

Answer 2

I think it depends on the industry and competition. If you are cool, then it is enough to publish a resume on the same HH - and you will be showered with offers, and employers (to the HH project) will pay. If you yourself are not very good, and in your field there are overdogs like you, then you will have to sweat into all the vacancies in the hope that they will take them at least somewhere, and even if you pay extra, it’s not a fact that they will take it in the near future .

Answer 3

There are much fewer offers on IT job search sites than those who want to get this job,

Because "job sites" is a business that sells job listings to job seekers and charges them for it.
Do not look for work on sites. Become a good specialist and go directly to the website of the company you want to work for, submit your resume directly, and not through "intermediaries".

Answer 4

Everything is trite, "the market man has decided." Salaried employees were not ready to pay for the placement of their resumes, and "free" freelancers are ready.
Plus, the consumption model is somewhat different, on hh the employer all the time, and the employee periodically, on freelance exchanges, the freelancer all the time, and the customer periodically.

Answer 5

If you look globally, then in both cases the company pays.

Answer 6

Because the exchange finance is more for those who need to "fill their hands" (relatively speaking), there is no order, no registration, no regulator of relations, in general, zero obligations to each other. I messed up, changed the profile with the name and continue to work. And there are already more vacancies on work sites for specialists with a "full hand", skills, and here it is already a businessman not you who works for himself and is looking for tasks for himself, but your employer.

Answer 7

This is the law of supply and demand. It seems that there are fewer vacancies on the job exchange than resumes. But HR needs hundreds of resumes to close one vacancy - it's much more difficult than finding a contractor for a one-time order - more responsible, therefore, in fact, resumes are in short supply.