Why is fx 8320 with 1.3 billion transistors 30-80% slower than ryzen 3 with 4 billion transistors? tire limit?

Question

Processors

why fx 8320 with 1.3 billion transistors is 30-80% slower than ryzen 3 with 4 billion transistors? tire limit?

It would seem that ryzen 3 should be 4 times faster than fx. because it has 4 times more transistors.

But it's not. why?

Answer 1

Due to scaling issues.
Scalability
Die scaling: how Intel downscaled...

Answer 2

Why isn't an elephant 3 times smarter than a human? Does he have 300 giganeurons, compared to 100 in humans?
Transistors are different for transistors, it can be cache, it can be computational extensions. It is possible to "code" transistors indefinitely, but get the result slower than it was.
Plus or minus, there is an adequate dependence only on the frequency of the CPU, but there are features like several commands per clock.