Answer the question
In order to leave comments, you need to log in
Why doesn't mdadm go into degraded when there is a bad block on one of the disks?
Actually, there is a RAID 5 of 6 disks built on mdadm.
Until a certain time, everything worked successfully, but when trying to pick up the files, the checksum of the copies was different.
By checking the surface of the disks, it was found that the disk / dev / sda fell down.
smartctl -a /dev/sda
SMART Attributes Data Structure revision number: 16
Vendor Specific SMART Attributes with Thresholds:
ID# ATTRIBUTE_NAME FLAG VALUE WORST THRESH TYPE UPDATED WHEN_FAILED RAW_VALUE
1 Raw_Read_Error_Rate 0x002f 200 200 051 Pre-fail Always - 0
3 Spin_Up_Time 0x0027 253 253 021 Pre-fail Always - 950
4 Start_Stop_Count 0x0032 100 100 000 Old_age Always - 116
5 Reallocated_Sector_Ct 0x0033 200 200 140 Pre-fail Always - 0
7 Seek_Error_Rate 0x002e 200 200 000 Old_age Always - 0
9 Power_On_Hours 0x0032 001 001 000 Old_age Always - 73628
10 Spin_Retry_Count 0x0032 100 100 000 Old_age Always - 0
11 Calibration_Retry_Count 0x0032 100 100 000 Old_age Always - 0
12 Power_Cycle_Count 0x0032 100 100 000 Old_age Always - 114
192 Power-Off_Retract_Count 0x0032 200 200 000 Old_age Always - 57
193 Load_Cycle_Count 0x0032 001 001 000 Old_age Always - 7888761
194 Temperature_Celsius 0x0022 113 094 000 Old_age Always - 37
196 Reallocated_Event_Count 0x0032 200 200 000 Old_age Always - 0
197 Current_Pending_Sector 0x0032 200 200 000 Old_age Always - 47
198 Offline_Uncorrectable 0x0030 200 200 000 Old_age Offline - 1
199 UDMA_CRC_Error_Count 0x0032 200 200 000 Old_age Always - 0
200 Multi_Zone_Error_Rate 0x0008 155 080 000 Old_age Offline - 12120
Personalities : [raid0] [raid1] [raid10] [raid6] [raid5] [raid4]
md127 : active raid5 sda3[0] sdf3[5] sde3[4] sdd3[3] sdc3[2] sdb3[1]
9743319040 blocks super 1.2 level 5, 64k chunk, algorithm 2 [6/6] [UUUUUU]
md1 : active raid10 sda2[0] sdf2[5] sde2[4] sdd2[3] sdc2[2] sdb2[1]
1566720 blocks super 1.2 512K chunks 2 near-copies [6/6] [UUUUUU]
md0 : active raid1 sda1[0] sdf1[5] sde1[4] sdd1[3] sdc1[2] sdb1[1]
4190208 blocks super 1.2 [6/6] [UUUUUU]
/dev/md127:
Version : 1.2
Creation Time : Mon Mar 16 21:27:21 2020
Raid Level : raid5
Array Size : 9743319040 (9291.95 GiB 9977.16 GB)
Used Dev Size : 1948663808 (1858.39 GiB 1995.43 GB)
Raid Devices : 6
Total Devices : 6
Persistence : Superblock is persistent
Update Time : Wed May 26 09:57:02 2021
State : clean
Active Devices : 6
Working Devices : 6
Failed Devices : 0
Spare Devices : 0
Layout : left-symmetric
Chunk Size : 64K
Consistency Policy : unknown
Name : 33ea55f9:RAID-5-0 (local to host 33ea55f9)
UUID : 04d214c4:ee331e6a:74ca0a04:5e846481
Events : 148
Number Major Minor RaidDevice State
0 8 3 0 active sync /dev/sda3
1 8 19 1 active sync /dev/sdb3
2 8 35 2 active sync /dev/sdc3
3 8 51 3 active sync /dev/sdd3
4 8 67 4 active sync /dev/sde3
5 8 83 5 active sync /dev/sdf3
Answer the question
In order to leave comments, you need to log in
Smart disk and mdadm are different things, mdadm will eject the disk from the array when it runs into inconsistency, such errors are written to dmesg, you can also see the error counter in /sys/block/mdX/md/mismatch_cnt
To check the status of the array, you can run a check (just scan for errors)
echo check > /sys/block/mdX/md/sync_action to
fix errors, you can run
echo repair > /sys/block/mdX/md/sync_action
You have 47 Current_Pending_Sector, not Reallocated_Sector_Ct.
This means that there was one unsuccessful attempt to read or write to these sectors. By itself, this condition is not considered an error. If there is another unsuccessful attempt, then the HDD will try to move the sector. The counter of relocation attempts (Reallocated_Event_Count) and, if the relocation is successful, the counter of relocated sectors (Reallocated_Sector_Ct) will increase.
If the retry is successful, the sector will be unmarked as suspicious.
Didn't find what you were looking for?
Ask your questionAsk a Question
731 491 924 answers to any question