Answer the question
In order to leave comments, you need to log in
Why are ports less than 1024 called "insecure"?
Actually the question is in the header.
Interested in where this name came from and what caused fears.
Answer the question
In order to leave comments, you need to log in
Perhaps this adjective is used to protect young administrators from running their leaky services as root
. Tk ports up to 1024 for binding require superuser rights as a root
. After hacking a leaky service, a hacker gets root access to the server
. Of course, Linux implements safe work with this kind of thing, but it is most often found out after losing access to the car
Usually the range is occupied by system services, you can take the port required by the system.
It seems like..
It's against the fool. In order not to put some service on the used port and then complain that it "does not work" / the service does not start.
See https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_TCP_and_UDP_...
For example, there are no nodes currently in use on ports 1-8.
Didn't find what you were looking for?
Ask your questionAsk a Question
731 491 924 answers to any question