L
L
littleguga2016-07-06 19:58:19
System administration
littleguga, 2016-07-06 19:58:19

Why are ports less than 1024 called "insecure"?

Actually the question is in the header.
Interested in where this name came from and what caused fears.

Answer the question

In order to leave comments, you need to log in

5 answer(s)
S
sim3x, 2016-07-06
@littleguga

Perhaps this adjective is used to protect young administrators from running their leaky services as root
. Tk ports up to 1024 for binding require superuser rights as a root
. After hacking a leaky service, a hacker gets root access to the server
. Of course, Linux implements safe work with this kind of thing, but it is most often found out after losing access to the car

#
#algooptimize #bottize, 2016-07-06
@user004

Usually the range is occupied by system services, you can take the port required by the system.
It seems like..

V
Vasily Pechersky, 2016-07-06
@Vasily_Pechersky

It's against the fool. In order not to put some service on the used port and then complain that it "does not work" / the service does not start.
See https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_TCP_and_UDP_...
For example, there are no nodes currently in use on ports 1-8.

D
Dimonchik, 2016-07-06
@dimonchik2013

nmap

K
Kirill Vasiliev, 2016-07-07
@vasilevkirill

Read
https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc6056

Didn't find what you were looking for?

Ask your question

Ask a Question

731 491 924 answers to any question