A
A
Alexander2012-08-01 20:25:06
Virtualization
Alexander, 2012-08-01 20:25:06

Which virtualizer does not require hardware virtualization?

Hello. There was a question, the virtualizer which does not demand hardware virtualization is necessary. I understand that there will be performance limitations, but the task is to raise 2 OS on one PC.

While I look narrowly at Proxmox or Citrix Xenserver.

Hence another question: do the virtualizers above require hardware virtualization?

PS A virtualizer is needed that does not require a graphical shell.

Thank you.

Answer the question

In order to leave comments, you need to log in

7 answer(s)
M
mikes, 2012-08-01
@mikes

I'm afraid now you will not find a hypervisor without the need for hardware support, yet it's some kind of perversion.
if there is a task to raise 2 OS on one machine, and you don’t want to spend money on a license for windows, then install ubuntu server and virtualbox headless.
in fact, everything that is needed will be ... though not as convenient as in a real hypervisor with its own console.

D
drunken, 2012-08-01
@drunken

vmware (esx in your case), xen, xenserver, openvz, bsd jail - do not require hardware support.
but remember that you can only run Windows on vmware and with very large performance losses, on the rest - only linux or bsd, respectively.

L
lesha_penguin, 2012-08-01
@lesha_penguin

All "container" virtualizers (OpenVZ, Lxc, FreeBSD Jail,...) do not require hardware virtualization. More precisely, they simply do not use it as unnecessary, since containers are executed as isolated groups of processes under the control of a common operating system kernel.
The main advantage: containers are “lighter”, you don’t need to pull the guest kernel even in paravirtualization. The main disadvantage: the isolation layer is "thinner", you cannot run Windows in a Linux container.

S
script88, 2012-08-01
@script88

Install proxmox and you will be happy. A very reasonable decision.

F
ftp13, 2012-08-01
@ftp13

Try WMware workstation (I can't give a link, it was a long time ago)

O
oia, 2012-08-01
@oia

Citrix Xenserver. 100% need hardware support, well, here is Comparison of virtual machines

N
nochkin, 2012-12-22
@nochkin

I know it's an old thread, but no answer.
VirtualBox does not require hardware virtualization and can be run without a GUI. At one time I kept several Windows virtual machines on a headless Linux host with processors without iron virtualization (some old Xeons).
There are a few small restrictions:
www.virtualbox.org/manual/ch10.html#hwvirt

Didn't find what you were looking for?

Ask your question

Ask a Question

731 491 924 answers to any question