Which Linux distribution to choose for a novice web developer?

Question

linux

I started doing web development, but I spent my whole life on Windows, so I plan to switch to Linux. and it’s interesting to study it yourself, and in vacancies they usually write that you need knowledge of administration, raising servers, etc. on Linux, and in general it seems like it’s not comme il faut to do web development from under Windows ...
So, there are just a lot of distribution kits, it’s reluctant to start from completely hardcore (i.e. without GUI), I tried to install ubuntu 12.04 and 13.04 at one time , the latter for some reason worked much slower than 12.04 (probably due to video firewood), but I heard such an opinion that ubuntu is generally very far away from the idea of ​​​​linux, performance / security is bad, etc.
What to choose?

Answer 1

I have been on Linux for 8 years and have tried a lot of things. At the moment, my main system is Elementart OS for about a year now. It is based on Ubuntu 12.04 but has been rewritten a lot.
What's cool about her? Since it does not come out according to a time cycle, but according to the “ready - roll out” principle, it subjectively has fewer glitches and is quite fast. If this is important to you, it is also a very beautiful system. In general, this is my advice to you - try it. Must like it.

Answer 2

Try Elementary OS , nice, responsive - at least in terms of interface - the minimum number of glitches, and purely technically this is Ubuntu 12.04 stable branches. The distribution is actively developing in parallel with Ubuntu. There is a cool Scratch
text editor - with a console, syntax highlighting, folder browsing and without a gram of extra. Another option is not to leave Windows, but to run the entire test environment (a headless virtual machine without an interface) under Vagrant .

Answer 3

If the computer is for development - I prefer ubuntu latest stable + kde.
For the server - debian.
Pluses - a similar system for installing / configuring packages via apt-get.

Answer 4

The taste and color of course, but I would recommend for Linux Mint to work with Mate.

Answer 5

To "out of the box" - (k, l, x) ubuntu, or Linux Mint (there are also SuSe, Mandriva (Mageia), Fedora). Not quite out of the box - debian, slackware. Hardmode - arch, gentoo. Desktop - look at the resources of the machine and the "like / dislike". By and large, they all differ mainly in the package system. Only, it seems to me that administration, etc., is especially important for a web developer. not needed, beyond general information, so take it out of the box and don't bother.

Answer 6

Fedora for desktop, CentOS for server.

Answer 7

Definitely Korora. Based on Fedora.

Answer 8

I also switched from windows.
I tried ubuntu first, but then I switched to debian and I'm still sitting (it seemed more stable than ubuntu).
It is convenient that you can also use it on the server.
An indisputable plus is that software is almost always available in the form of deb packages.
I like the lightweight xfce that comes out of the box - it works very fast.

Answer 9

There are two distribution options:
deb, rpm.
there are also prefabricated constructors like gents or FreeBSD.
in fact, in principle, there is a standard set of software, which differs little in distributions - kde, gnome. open|libre-office, squid, sendmail, postfix, etc.
so it's more a matter of habits - I'm more able to cook deb-based, someone is used to rhel / centos, someone generally sits on BSD

Answer 10

On the hospital and on the mint laptop (13.04). There are problems with the network (periodic disconnects in the office corporate network) and auto-connection to wifi after sleep.
Would recommend mint on debian with cinnamon if you don't like mate. No issues with updates by definition, unlike ubuntu like.