Which is cheaper: keep a server at home or buy a dedicated one?

Question

Network administration

The wheelbarrow is free at home.
Previously hosted separately, now there are few resources.
How, according to the assessment, does it usually go out in a standard apartment to keep electricity bills and a static ip?
Have a win?
Goal: sites, web projects, and 50/50 I will jump to a platform other than apach.

Answer 1

Mhm. My advice to you is to rent a virtual machine.
Keeping a server at home if it works for 3 years is cheaper than in hetzner, but it causes a lot of inconvenience. Silent powerful configurations cost from 30-40 thousand, and constant background noise is sooooo tormenting. Sleep is much better without it.
Well, plus the home Internet is of a completely different quality - it drops often, access through all sorts of pptp / l2tp (which is much slower than a direct connection in packets per second - and this is important for the server), there are usually all sorts of indistinct restrictions that are not described anywhere. Well, if something breaks, they can fix it for you for a week.
Plus, there can be problems with food at home. If you put it in the pantry, then with cooling, dust and so on. In general, it is very difficult to drink uptime at least in 99% of the house. At me while hardly hardly 95% leaves with the UPS. It is not worth hosting sites on this one)
You can use a home piece of iron for experiments.

Answer 2

In terms of electricity, if a simple server consumes ~ 200 watts, we get about 400 rubles per month. Static address 100-150r depending on the operator.
That is, if you count only according to these 2 criteria, you will pay no more than $ 20 per month. Which is basically beneficial.
Only in my opinion it is also necessary to take into account the cost of the server, and its payback time, as well as depreciation.
In the same hetzner, in a year you will receive for the same money a server with an increased amount of memory \ hdd or a more powerful cpu. But hardly at home.
Also, the quality of the communication channel of your telecom operator can be much worse than that of the host, and this can cause negative feedback from visitors to your resources.

Answer 3

It depends on which one, if you focus on such www.ihc.ru/ds.html?ref=281&gclid=CMrbpJeK0LwCFaLUc... www.1gb.ru/price_server.php ispserver.com/ru/products/dedicated?gclid=CNWrwIWM...
then the cheapest one will cost as utility bills for a one-room apartment per month.
Homemade is, by and large, an extra smut, and no more, but it will be cheaper in any case, the question is different, when will it pay off, or at least start providing for itself.

Answer 4

Keeping a car at home 24/7 means a light bill. Sometimes very small.
keeping a server at home in the literal sense - HP, Dell, IBM, implies, in addition to a hellish bill for light, also a hellish noise level, Tower servers from the ones I noticed are much quieter than rack ones, due to more voluminous space inside for cooling, but still , make noise and eat electricity

Answer 5

I solved the issue unambiguously for myself and raised my sandbox on a vps-ke. If you monitor sites like lowendstock and lowendbox for several days, you can find very interesting options.
If you already have a 24x7 enabled server at home, and your Internet tariff plan includes a free static ip, then it's much easier to set up a server at home.
Plus, a combined version is possible, I did it at one time. The cheapest vps with a dedicated white ipv4 serves as such a window for requests that go to your home server. Communication is configured either through ssh tunnels or through openvpn (I did exactly openvpn).

Answer 6

for any experiments it makes sense to keep at home. especially if there is actually some kind of machine (for example, a home file server) that is already running 24x7. If the project at least somehow claims to be production, then personally I am categorically in favor of using external VPS or VDS hosts, see for yourself.
Above, a friend has calculations for a home server. I host several lightly loaded sites on one microinstance on AWS. along with traffic, storing backups on S3, etc. comes out no more than $18/mo. And it's by no means the cheapest solution.

Answer 7

If this is a commercial production, then I would definitely take VPS on external Internets. Fortunately now you can find very cheap deals. Reliability will be higher, less hemorrhoids.

Answer 8

For 400r / month you can take VDS in Lokum .
True, I myself have not used VDS yet, but shared hosting pleases (one of the few providers with PHP 5.4 out of the box)

Answer 9

Looking for what. For fun sites, tests, all sorts of rubbish - houses are cheaper
. For serious projects, of course not.
If we compare the server at home and any VDS - the home server will be cooler.
And if it is a dedicated server in a DC, then they are not so expensive now hostsuki.pro/all/8-2013-god-pokazal-chto-vydelenny...

Answer 10

I keep the server at home - for small projects - that's it. I tried cloud hosting, various vps and was disappointed. Or expensive, or much less resources. Especially taking into account the fact that the fashion for ssd has now gone - on cheap vds they give very little space.

Answer 11

It all depends very much on the stability of your provider.
For 6 years I have a 400 watt server at home at the peak of loads, it works 24/7.
With a three-tariff meter, 200-250 rubles are paid for electricity per month.
Which is significantly cheaper than the monthly fee for VPS.
The server got almost for free though. but even when buying a server for 6 years, the cost of iron would pay off.
Hardware upgrade and replacement of screws were not carried out, I think this year to change the array.
Well, again, I love hardware and the neighborhood with the server pleases my soul.
By the way, there is one more point that was not mentioned, as a rule, there is a wife, children, grandmother at home, and this is a separate item of expenditure for security.
They talk a lot about noise, my server is next to a refrigerator in the corridor, in a separate cabinet made of metal and glass, the noise from it is minimal and is not heard in the rooms.