Which entry-level graphics card to choose for 3D modeling?

Question

3D

Hi all!
There was a need to purchase a video camera ONLY for 3D modeling. Need an entry-level card, because. the person for whom this device is bought is just beginning to delve into the basics of 3D. Preferably up to $250.
I went to the Autodesk website, they recommend a quadra: here .
For the price, I liked the Quadro 600 model .
I myself have never dealt with squares, I am tormented by doubts. Many praise the quadra, because it is tailored for specific tasks + not as voracious and hot as gaming cards ...
Is it worth taking or is it better to look towards the GeForce GTX-series?

Answer 1

No wonder people praise Quadro. They are really designed for floating point calculations. There are even special drivers for these cards.
GTX is only suitable for gaming and integer computing. The performance of floating point calculations is artificially reduced (just in order to sell Quadro more expensively).
PS I mean calculations with double precision.

Answer 2

It seems to me that the approach itself is a bit wrong. Are you sure that a video card is needed at all or that it is needed more than a percent?
Most of my friends who "just started to delve into the basics of 3D" on this and finished. A video card is really needed only for comfortable modeling of very complex objects. At first, the video card will not slow down the study of 3D in any way.
It is not clear from the question how much you are aware of the issue, just in case I will say that the video card does not affect rendering at all. Only the percentage is important here (moreover, 4 cores will actually be 2 times faster than 2 cores) and, to some extent, memory. Therefore, if, for example, we go in the direction of special effects or interior rendering, etc. - where it is light, materials, and not the complexity of the shapes of objects that come first, then the video card will not affect at all at any stage. Enough of your current one.
Therefore, I would take a video card when it is really needed, and not just in case.

Answer 3

Doesn't he already have enough? It's just that a beginner doesn't need mega performance until they're modeling something very large (a car or an airplane, an entire assembly). On single details, even built-in ones are enough with the head.
From personal experience, when modeling single parts and simple assemblies, there was no difference in performance between the Quadro 6000 and the GTX 480 (which are the same thing).

Answer 4

In real work with 3D Max, large video card power is not needed.
Of course, there is such a technology as CUDA, but due to the fact that it is supported by a limited number of renderers (V-ray does not support it!), The benefit of this technology is almost zero.
I would advise you to better pay attention to the processor power and the amount of memory.

Answer 5

Performance problems arise only when displaying a large number of some sub-elements of the edited object, such as vertices and edges. If they are singled out, this slows down the work even more.
Approximately 100,000 items.
If you avoid a very dense grid, then everything will be fine.
It will work with mid-poly models even on a weak game map. For example GeForce 8600gts.

Answer 6

Look at the article here
habrahabr.ru/post/142369/
The author recommends gtx 570-580, although there are nuances.

Answer 7

In general, I also began to understand this, and realized that I need to look more at the bus width , since data processing is going on there, and the more it is, the better. But this, of course, already increases the cost of video cards. Then look at the percent, only amd and no intels, amd is sharpened for all 3d modeling, i.e. data processing.
Also on the vidyuhi you need to look at the core frequency, the type of memory is not less than GDDR5. Well, all this is customized to the percent.