Which configuration for DELL N5010 will be the most suitable?

Question

Iron

Hello everyone, not long ago a friend asked me to "upgrade" his old laptop DELL Inspiron N5010. In general, after fiddling a little with the documentation, I realized that its stock processor (iNtel P6100), hard drive (WD, 250Gb), as well as RAM (there are two 2GB sticks, but for unknown reasons, the bars have different frequencies, apparently with independent "upgrade", it was not drilled with the frequency of the default die) you can not frailly apnut. As I read, the standard configs (from the manufacturer) looked like this:
1. Processor: 630QM / 330M / 350M / 370M / 380M / 430M / 450M / 460M / 480M / 740QM / P6000 / P6100 / P6200.
2. Memory sticks: 1333 MHz, from 2GB to 6GB.
3. HD: you can also plug in an SSD, since sata3 is used.
In general, having generated the most successful config, we get:
1. Processor - Intel Core i5 480m, 2.66Hz, (used - 850 rubles).
2. RAM - NoName, 2Gb, 1333MHz (NEW - 850 rubles). I take only one, due to the fact that his native chopping block is 2GB with a frequency of 1333MHz, and he is purchased with a frequency of 1066MHz.
3. HD - SSD 120Gb WD Green (NEW - 2.600 rubles).
Total: 4300 rubles.
After the configuration, I had some leading questions. Due to the fact that the socket in this laptop is PGA988, and the chipset is H55, then by searching on Ali you can find i5 560m for the same price. In fact, it differs only in the boost frequency (3.2Hz), but since it costs the same, one could take it. It is just compatible with H55 chipset. However, it is not in the list of stock configurations. And actually the first question, can I take the i5 560m, will there be iron compatibility conflicts?
The same question, in the drain you can cut up to 6GB of RAM, but the processors support up to 8GB, can I stick two 4GB sticks or not? Thanks in advance for your replies.

Answer 1

The question has been asked in different interpretations a thousand times whether to use it or not.
No default styles needed - just use the grid.
Bootstrap in its purest form is great for a web application where only functionality is needed, and the design consists in choosing a color, font and logo image.
But it can be easily changed, or you can write everything yourself. It's like jq for js - everyone knows that native js is faster and easier, but not everyone can write in it as well as in jq. If you think that you have the strength and time to write something yourself - do not use bootstrap or use it only for the site admin panel.

Answer 2

Let's start with the "philosophical" question - they use it, so yes, it is necessary. For a long time there has been a tendency to move away from the standard wow effect from the first visit, which only works like a virus. Content came to the fore, which is actually unique for each site, and usability, everything else, in fact, the details are not so important.
Bootstrap, like any similar framework (I use Uikit), is convenient for building a skeleton (framework), on which you can then throw meat (design, content). You don’t need to redefine anything, just customize and upload a new build, and the site changes, i.e. this is templating at the style level, it's very cool, oh I think the further development of style cascades will continue in this direction.
Regarding the expansion - analyze, all these resolutions were not chosen by chance, and in 99.99% of cases these steps are quite enough.

Answer 3

1. Reduces development time.
2. Facilitates further support (although if the site was made up by an intelligent person, then it will be so fast, if the layout designer has hands from the lower back, then frameworks will not help).
The question "The grid breaks and 4 screens" is far-fetched. 4 resolution ranges, not 4 screens. This is a big difference because these ranges cover all resolutions. Plus, they are customizable (as well as the number of layout columns).
The "more or less unique design" question is a misunderstanding of the goals of the framework. Bootstrap doesn't give you the bells and whistles of hundreds of gradients for a single button that your designer will surely draw, it gives you the tools to create page structure. You will have to draw the design.
"I smell a catch" - again an incorrect understanding of the goals of the framework. But it still doesn’t hurt to go to getbootstrap.com, where helpers and js plugins that go into bootstrap are described in more detail. Everything with live examples. Although I personally use mostly modal and button from plugins (to display the inscription "loading" on the button for Ajax requests, but others are also useful).
"Throw a link" - getbootstrap.com. Apparently you were anywhere, but not on your home site.