N
N
Nikita Ivanov2015-03-01 07:45:10
AMD
Nikita Ivanov, 2015-03-01 07:45:10

Which AMD processor to choose?

I would like to understand what is more expedient to buy: AMD A6-6400K Black Edition FM2 Richland core Number of cores 2 Number of threads 2 32 nm Nominal processor frequency, GHz 3.9 Frequency in Intel Turbo Boost/AMD Turbo Core mode, GHz 4.1 L1 cache 64 KB / 2 x 16 KB L2 Cache 1 MB L3 Cache N/A Power Dissipation, W 65 Optional Integrated HD Media Accelerator, Integrated Dual Channel DDR3 Memory Controller, AMD64 Support, PCI Express 2.0 Support, Unlocked Multiplier
Integrated Radeon HD 8470D Instructions Supported ABM,AES,AVX ,BMI,F16C,
FMA3,FMA4,MMX,SSE,SSE2,SSE3,SSE4,SSE4a,SSSE3,TBM,XOP Enhanced Virus Protection, PowerNow! / Cool'n'Quiet, Turbo Core 3.0,Virtualization or this one:
AMD A8-7600 Socket FM2+ Core Kaveri Number of cores
4 Number of threads 4 Process technology 28 nm Nominal processor frequency, GHz 3.1 Frequency in Intel Turbo Boost/AMD Turbo Core mode, GHz 3.8 L1 cache 2 x 96 KB / 4 x 16 KB L2 cache 2 x 2 MB L3 cache N/A
Integrated dual-channel memory controller DDR3, PCI Express 3.0 support
Integrated Radeon R7 graphics Supported instructions AES,AVX,BMI1,F16C,FMA3,FMA4,
MMX,SSE,SSE2,SSE3,SSE4,SSE4.1,SSE4.2,SSE4a,SSSE3,TBM,XOP Technologies AMD64,Enhanced Virus Protection,
PowerNow! / Cool'n'Quiet, Turbo Core 3.0,Virtualization. The price differs by about 2 times. I need a computer for work, there will be no gluttonous toys or 3DS, except that I will use Photoshop / Illustrator CC. Vidyakha will be used built-in.

Answer the question

In order to leave comments, you need to log in

8 answer(s)
W
Winner_DE, 2015-03-01
@Winner_DE

series a kuyna, take q8 \ 9xxxx and video from the hands of gts 260

N
nfire, 2015-03-01
@nfire

Two processors differ in price and performance twice.
If you have money - take it more expensive, if not - cheaper.
And what does it mean for work? Work is different. Documents in Word are enough to type an atom.

S
Sergey, 2015-03-01
@edinorog

none =). AMD is doing so badly that they had to persuade the manufacturers of set-top boxes to use their processors. otherwise they would have gone bankrupt long ago. think about it .. but is it from a good life?)))

A
Alexey, 2015-03-01
@somebodytolove

I would take the first option, A6 Richland in low-threaded tasks (Photoshop, WWW, JS) due to the frequency it will be more interesting. The number of cores is not so important, and the price is probably lower.

A
Alexander Shapovalov, 2015-03-01
@shapovalov_org

A10 of course with the largest index. And better wait for processors on the Zen architecture)

G
Gluck Virtualen, 2015-03-01
@gluck59

Intel.

U
urgot, 2015-06-11
@urgot

Agree with previous post. Only Intel. In general, as far as processor performance is concerned, this company has no equal. From Intel i5 itself, I bought it 3-4 years ago, when the prices were still adequate. I bought it through a store, if you are interested, here is a link to the m.ua/kata/186 category . To this day, no overloads or sagging are observed. It does not heat up even at maximum load, and this is with stock thermal paste.

Didn't find what you were looking for?

Ask your question

Ask a Question

731 491 924 answers to any question