When is it not necessary to publish sources under the LGPL?

V

V

Vitaly Stolyarov2015-01-02 22:59:25

Licenses for software and other works

Vitaly Stolyarov, 2015-01-02 22:59:25

When is it not necessary to publish sources under the LGPL?

There is a question about using the library under the LGPL license, to be more precise it is wxWidgets. But it makes no sense to open the source codes, or rather, it is even unsafe, therefore their publication is excluded, but is there a way without violating the license and not disclosing the source code of the application?

Reply

Answer the question

Answer the question

In order to leave comments, you need to log in

0 answer(s)

Similar questions

I

illigarium2019-11-09 13:48:53

Is it possible to use GPL and LGPL libraries for a web service for commercial purposes? 1Reply

V

Vasya Pupkin2021-05-09 10:27:43

Is it allowed to install personal Adobe Acrobat Pro on the corp. a laptop? 5Reply

V

Vadim2017-08-30 21:52:12

What's up with startups and React? 2Reply

F

flafy42020-02-29 15:32:17

What license can I use when selling on Envato? 1Reply

A

Anton Shamanov2017-12-30 00:52:31

Does the GNU License v3.0 allow the creation and development of a non-commercial fork? 1Reply

Didn't find what you were looking for?

Ask your question

Ask a Question

731 491 924 answers to any question