What is the ideal specification for a web designer, web layout designer, programmer?

Question

Project management

A large number of questions about the TK or a similar document were asked here by everyone, the topic is eternal.
But no matter how much you search on the Internet, you come across some common patterns that are not clear whether they were used at all by someone or not in practice.
I would like to appeal to the community, who do not mind publishing good examples of the technical specifications for the development of the site, or the entire project or individual pieces - a section for a designer, a section for a layout designer, a section for a programmer. Or maybe there are already similar documents on the net, then please provide links. But no matter how much I searched - everywhere some kind of semi-finished product. I would like a more complete version, consider the version of the TK tested in practice, which can be used for your work and your customers.
As you know, the success of communication with the customer and the implementation of the project to please the customer and his wishes depend on the accuracy and completeness of the technical specifications. So I want to find this ideal TK. To whom it is not a pity and is ready to share the examples, please. I hope a mutually beneficial exchange of examples of TK, prototypes of TK, specifications, or in general any documentation that the developers are guided by during development, will be useful to everyone who subscribed to this question and publishes their answer.
Thanks for the tips and links.

Answer 1

1. An example of a TK template for layout , you can customize it for yourself.
2. Checklist for layout.

Answer 2

You would have to decide what you want, and there the form will already appear. For example, it is very convenient when there is a real formalism from TK and the definition of those places where creativity can or cannot be shown.
For example, do:
However, it is more like a brief when discussing details. Ultimately it should be:
Otherwise, you can specify (or rather agree in advance)
Steps example:

1. demonstration on the side of the performer (on his server)
   
2. payment (methods that suit both parties, and the customer, in fact, will be able to choose the option already at the time of payment)
   
3. sending the result to the customer (how, where, does the cost include installation, deployment of something)
   
4. support (how, how much, when, under what circumstances, paid or free, etc.)
   

Answer 3

Too general question

ideal TK = hourly pay + tasks passed through PM

Answer 4

I agree that there is no ideal TK, but there is a TK that maximally limits the disputes of the parties, i.e. as specific as possible.
The customer still, regardless of the TOR, expects more, and even within the extremely limited TOR for him, he can start talking about quality and not accept work. Therefore, it makes sense to also describe the minimum level of quality for some items.

Answer 5

Before creating a site, it is necessary to draw up a specific technical task. If you refuse this, then the performer simply will not understand what he needs to do. Accordingly, he can let you down with the timing. And also you can just get a non-relevant site where few people want to be. To avoid all this, the easiest way is to order a technical specification (I know people like TZprofi, they advised me) and only then give it to the programmer. To avoid cheating, you need to control the performer at the development stage. Then you will not be deceived for money and you will get an excellent site)