What is the best way to deal with extra entries in the labor?

Question

Career in IT

It turned out to be a very stupid situation of the following character.
5 years worked in one organization (still a student)
6 years in
another I obviously sat out at my last job and as a result:
In the first company, I worked for 2 months and the department closed
In the second, 3 months, the project didn’t work for them and they asked me to leave so as not to go beyond the test
In the third month, I got some tasks, but they wanted me completely different and decided to leave on his own (also 2 months).
Actually a question. What to do with employment records? The personnel officers will have questions, and although I won’t lie in anything if I tell the truth and I broke up with all the former employers, i.e. I don't have any bad records, but still.
From here I think, can I restore the labor for loss? There will really be a "duplicate" stamp, which may raise questions, and just say to everyone that I have been freelancing for the last year?
Or how to be? Does it make sense to restore the first place of work? In fact, he was a laboratory assistant there. Or is it better right away in the second where I was an engineer?
Or can you suggest your own?
PS Yes, I'm IT, the problem is with HRs who start the conversation in the wrong direction. "Tell me why you left your previous job."
PPS how to be? About the previous places to remain silent and say "freelanced" or what? It’s just that if I come to get settled, and there are records about which I kept silent, then questions will also arise.

Answer 1

Are you an IT specialist? What the hell is labor? No one will look into it when making a decision to hire you or not, they look only at your knowledge

Answer 2

Everyone gives a shit about the work book.
As a last resort - tell exactly the same as to us now.

Answer 3

Labor is needed only for registration of a pension, it does not affect employment in any way.
For the employer, your resume is important, where you list what you consider necessary.
And only the personnel officer will look at the labor one, who draws you up as an employee after the decision to hire, and he doesn’t care where you worked.

Answer 4

I wonder who the people who write comments ala "They look at your knowledge, and not at work" work for? This is nothing more than speculation, and not very true. In the sharazhkin office, maybe they don’t look. Where there is an eternal turnover and a lot of work, and it is necessary that at least someone do something, they can also not look. But there your experience is not really needed, rather extra hands. In serious organizations, they still look at it. They do not want to hire such specialists, there is too much trouble with you when hiring, so that you leave after 2-3 months. Even your knowledge, even if it is super-duper, will not help here, because, as you know, there are no irreplaceable ones.
If such questions arise, I would advise you to answer them as they are and give contacts of previous employers, having previously agreed with them. So that they confirm that you didn’t kick there and didn’t send everything and everyone, but simply due to circumstances, they couldn’t leave you. Ideally, they will also say that in general you are a very good worker.
pS It is not a fact that the people who conducted the interviews will call them, but they will definitely take into account that you are ready for such a turn and are ready to confirm your words that it is not your fault in short-term work.

Answer 5

Many state-owned enterprises pay by calculating the salary from the coefficients. So, coefficient. Depending experience they precisely consider on labor.

Answer 6

As a rule, the work book appears on the stage already in the process of employment as a fait accompli.
That is, at first a decision is made on the candidate, and then in the process of registration - a work book, SNILS, TIN, etc.
Moreover, EMNIP still has a mode of hiring by transfer. That is, the employee brings a letter of translation from a new place to an old one and only then receives a labor one.
It is clear that sometimes a terrible jamb in the labor office can stop the ongoing employment process, but it should contain records of the class "fired due to moving to prison" or "fired for drinking" -)))

Answer 7

Personnel officers do not care about your records in the labor

Answer 8

Your entries in most cases will not raise questions.
As a rule, at any interview they ask about past jobs and the reason for leaving the last place, this is a normal practice and it has nothing to do with your track record. If hr is interested in your past jobs and their short duration, you can always say everything as it is, in most cases this issue is treated with understanding.
So do not be smart with a book and do not make an elephant out of a fly)