Answer the question
In order to leave comments, you need to log in
What exactly is better to use from BEM?
Hello everyone, not so long ago I ran through the documentation for BEM technology and I liked it, or rather the naming methodology, but as soon as I moved on to another section, I realized that you can use the project assembly and i-bem.js (kind of like their framework), I read, read, didn’t catch a lot, especially the sequence of actions and the principle of describing bemjson files, but it’s a matter of time, re-read a couple of times, practice and everything will be super. So, the question is, is it worth using all these wisdoms with different folders, project assembly, etc. because I read that it seems like they don’t use it anywhere except Yandex, but only use their naming methodology. It’s just that I already have a certain framework for the project structure, and it differs greatly from their structure. So, to be or not to be? Should I use it or not and will it benefit me in any way?
Answer the question
In order to leave comments, you need to log in
I really like the full stack approach itself, but the implementation is top three IMHO. Plus the documentation leaves much to be desired. I use the approach but based on pug + a set of TARS tasks.
And in general, it seems to me that the guys from Yandex have given up on supporting the open source project a little. The build system that is presented on bem.info is pretty outdated.
I use the RSCSS concept. I liked her more than BEM.
rscss.io/other-resources.html
Didn't find what you were looking for?
Ask your questionAsk a Question
731 491 924 answers to any question