M
M
Maxim Kuzmin2016-03-03 17:19:39
Social media
Maxim Kuzmin, 2016-03-03 17:19:39

What do you think about the idea of ​​creating such a site that unites different social networks, or rather user profiles?

The idea is this. A person visits the site and is prompted to connect several social networks to the profile. After connecting, the user will have a common feed, where all posts from the feeds of his profiles from other social networks merge. networks. There will also be general messages, general comments (for example, a comment under a VK post is written from the user's VK profile, while, of course, the design and functionality are the same).
There was also an idea to merge mail here, and so that a person does not have to worry about which mail the letter came to or to which social. the network received a message, the chat window will simply be displayed in the same way, the list of correspondence - no distinguishing features. Unless somewhere in the corner of the correspondence indicate what it is: mail, VK, FB or something else.
Simply put, a modern social media user has to be in time everywhere, separately look at Yandex mail, then go to email, then check VK, reply to a comment on Twitter, post a status on FB, and so on ... And I want to combine all this under a common denominator.
This idea is very crude and appeared just a couple of hours ago. But I described the general features.
Do you think the service will be in demand?

Answer the question

In order to leave comments, you need to log in

14 answer(s)
T
Taras Serevann, 2016-03-03
@Taras_Serevann

The idea is not new and is in the air: surely someone has already implemented this, but you don’t know, because it didn’t take off.
But I can tell you from my own experience: do not listen to me and all the other commentators, as the startup will take off or not depends only on your efforts and randomness. Try it, it will work - well done, you are in gold. It won't work - well, it was a valuable experience that will help you in future projects.
So try it: what if you're lucky? ;)

L
littleguga, 2016-03-03
@littleguga

There is such
And such
And here is a small list.
The main problem is that no one needs it, except for SMM (who need to post everywhere at once).
An ordinary user chooses one network, which he uses + a significant number of users have switched to mobile applications.

Y
Yuri, 2016-03-03
@riky

the devil is in the details.
try sketching a technical solution and making a prototype.
of the problems, for example, for working with VK, only:
- the user needs to get you a standalone token, only from it you can work with correspondence. and vk there warns "do not copy otherwise you may lose access to the account"
- for standalone, vk may start showing captcha, as you have a bunch of sends from one ip.
- a separate crap - make real-time receiving messages during correspondence.
most users still do not need it, and half of those who need it will be afraid to give access to their messages, and even on all services. it is natural that such services will attract the attention of "services".
but generally try it. make a prototype and try to "sell" it to at least your friends

A
Andrey Alekseev, 2016-03-03
@Aniriksiy

I'm afraid that twitter and facebook will prevent this. Why would they give their users (their money from users) to another site, even if it would be more comfortable for the user.
You see, if users do not sit on Facebook, but read their messages on a third-party site, then advertisers will have nothing to do on Facebook.

F
four4, 2016-03-03
@four4

Technically, this is not a very big problem (until the giants noticed you and began to interfere, as ICQ changed the protocol in its time).
Messengers with social support networks have been around for many years. I don't know how successful they are. But technically it is feasible - they have been around for a long time.
But I, for example, would not trust my accounts to someone left.
Yes, yes, I know, there are all kinds of oAuth, etc., that is, the password does not need to be reported. But such an application / site will definitely want a lot of rights (almost full rights).
And you (or those who hacked you) will definitely have a huge temptation on behalf of millions of users to post all sorts of advertisements. The temptation will be - it's millions of dough.

S
Sjr, 2016-03-03
@Sjr

I went to implement, I'll tell you in a couple of months :)

C
CityCat4, 2016-03-03
@CityCat4

This is not required by users. Because if you are not an SMM, you are not able to maintain constant communication in several networks.
Sites don't need it. Because they can't show you ads.
The question is - who needs it, except for SMM?

T
trevoga_su, 2016-03-03
@trevoga_su

There are already so many social networks and their varieties that you are amazed. But there are major monopolies. And to compete with VK or FB is the same as creating a real business selling grub and starting to compete with Auchan or Dixie or Pyaterochka. And you, apparently, want to compete with them, so that all users, as if by a moment of a magic wand, leave their homes and switch to your service

X
xmoonlight, 2016-03-03
@xmoonlight

Discarded forces.
Create something that people need today.
For example, help them earn money and they will pay you for it.

A
Alexey Nikolaev, 2016-03-03
@Heian

I saw a similar project five years ago.

N
nekritik, 2016-03-03
@nekritik

A similar startup used to be popular - www.bestpersons.ru/.

S
Stanislav Makarov, 2016-03-04
@Nipheris

Also there was an idea to merge here also mail

You don't need to send my mail anywhere.
The whole problem of such projects is trust.
You are going to keep so much critical data on your server that if you were at least seven spans, I would not trust you with this data.
And those who do not think about such things use one or two social networks, and one mail (and even then rarely). And whoever thinks, he understands very well - different mails / accounts are different for that, so that no one can link them with each other.
In general, posts from feeds could be read in RSS readers, if it were profitable for social networks to give RSS streams. However, for some reason they don't.

S
Sergey Sapov, 2016-03-10
@softmart

Make Facebook from VK interfaces. Because I don’t understand what Facebook employees are doing there, but it’s extremely inconvenient to use it. VK has an order of magnitude better interface and interaction.

S
spotifi, 2016-05-20
@spotifi

Idea - floating on the surface. The one who does the best will survive.
Do the best.
I don't see how you can do it on the record.
Reading is still possible. But for reading, this is nafig who needs it.

Didn't find what you were looking for?

Ask your question

Ask a Question

731 491 924 answers to any question