Answer the question
In order to leave comments, you need to log in
What CMS to use for a lightweight business card site?
Hello.
What you need: Make a business card site for 3-5 pages. Of the properties of the site, the most important are speed and modern appearance.
What we have: Little experience with html ("with a dictionary") and php (maximum - to correct something else), photoshop at an "average" level, desire.
What's the question? What cms to use and why?
Thank you.
Answer the question
In order to leave comments, you need to log in
look towards wordpress, there are many ready-made modules and themes. Performance with caching is enough for the eyes.
Are you sure that this site needs a CMS. If we are talking about 3-5 pages, isn't it easier to throw in HTML and that's it. Then the cheapest hosting will be enough and the performance will be at the level: "the server gave the statics"
http://getsimple.ru/
GetSimple is a free open source content management system (CMS) that works very fast because it does not use databases.
Ideal for creating mini-sites and business card sites, because. clear and easy to use even for those who are poorly versed in the Internet.
I would advise in your case to abandon html as a means of editing content. Well, they say ... store everything in markdown, it has a very simple and intuitive syntax, there is a bunch of everything for it, there is no way to accidentally break the markup, etc. I usually push markdown if the content manager (or the client just) has little knowledge of html, so far there have been no negative reviews.
For business cards, I like piecrust . The content is formatted as an option in markdown and then a static version of the site is simply generated from the templates. Everything works very quickly, quite flexible.
There is also bolt . The thing is also quite interesting, simple, not just on files, but on sqlite / mysql with an admin panel. content also seems to be through markdown.
There is also pico cms. Also a funny mini-cms on files.
CMS "general purpose" - modx , not lightweight, but it does not spoil it, in the case of a small site everything will work very quickly.
In your particular case, I support the idea with a static html generator, I myself used jekyll . Advantages: no need for apache (nginx gives statics well), excellent security and not demanding on updates (there is no CMS as such, there are content generators on the developer's machine), works at the speed of light, the internal structure is transparent and trivial.
I asked the same question a year ago. I scoured the forums, dug up from 2 dozen CMS (super-duper-optimized and lightweight), and then I accidentally needed a site (not for this task) and took WP. I thought that there would be performance problems, but I was wrong - there is caching. So I got over this problem and take Wordpress, for which I don’t have to sit down to write an additional module myself, if something needs to be expanded dramatically on the current platform. The problem is only in the weight of the engine, but this is not a problem at all - even the cheapest hosting rates come from a gigabyte, and these tens of megabytes simply pale against this background.
Didn't notice jekyllrb or similar. On the topic, you can read here Static website generators . Need comments? We connect third parties.
Pros
+ no database
+ minimal server load
+ pure html + js
I recommend Wordpress. If necessary, it scales, but at the same time it makes it easy to start making a website.
I'll put in my two cents: berta cms
Drag and drop, the ability to insert embed widgets, no databases.
http://www.berta.me/
https://github.com/berta-cms/berta
Also take a look at Indexhibit
http://www.indexhibit.org/
Another home made one:
MonstraCMS - http:/ /monstra.org/
as well as http://max-3000.com/
And one more on the files:
http://staceyapp.com/
For your tasks it is quite possible to do without CMS. Look at website builders. In this case, no programming knowledge is needed at all, no need to bother with hosting, availability, domains, etc. Just choose a template, modify it if necessary, then fill it with content, bind a domain (if you don't like the one given during registration) and you're done. I like the umi.ru service - a bunch of templates, there are adaptive ones. You can also look at ucoz.ru , but there advertising banners are annoying. Or WIX .
Pico CMS . Here, I recently stumbled upon it. Very simple, slick. Base on files.
You can take my new development: WebsitePad Freelancer .
Opportunities:
Or my previous development WebProject will do . Creates a simple HTML site, with an arbitrary structure, you can attach any template or use ready-made ones from the section on the site.
Look here - cms without databases , many simple cms, including for business card sites.
C MS is needed when there is content. Otherwise, just a template engine and static text is enough.
Why put a heavyweight CMS, the same Wp, for static on 3-5 pages? It is more logical to pay attention either to flat html frameworks or to lightweight cms. Here Anchor is quite an interesting thing, I have not seen it before.
Wordpress with the static-html-output plugin
Through WP itself, you make the desired site (easy, convenient, all that), then convert it to html pages with the plugin.
There are no problems with the look - there are a lot of templates, and they do-remake them cheaply.
This is all assuming you don't need any dynamics. If you need dynamics - then just wp - without plugins, it works quite fast.
On the monster, simple sites are convenient to do without the need to have a database. Here, for example, how I did it last year http://pergamed.ru/
You can see our cms - nespicms.com .
There is a free version for business card functionality (without ecommerce).
if just 3 pages then wordpress
is still an option.
Joomla, you select a template from ready-made and fresh ones, for example, there
are both paid and free ones, buy, install and fill in the content for yourself a little bit.
for business cards, both the first and second are 146% suitable, I use the second more often.
just remember the main thing, if you download some module \ component \ plugin, then download it from the office. sources, because often people build shells.
Didn't find what you were looking for?
Ask your questionAsk a Question
731 491 924 answers to any question