S
S
schastny2011-06-10 05:04:26
Xen
schastny, 2011-06-10 05:04:26

virtual machine control panel

Advise which panel is good.

What is available now.
One server: Debian Squeeze + Xen 4.0.1 and virtual machines on it.
The whole thing is worth the provider of one. The provider presses IPs, so NAT and port forwarding.
To automate the creation of virtual machines, I turned on DHCP.
The configuration files of virtual machines have a special option for port forwarding.
(I sawed half of the binding on the shell which and a couple of Python scripts. :) Who needs it, I can share the diffs.)
IPs for each machine from the subnet 192.168.x.1, on vifs in the host machine 192.168.x.254. There is no network between virtual machines.

What do you want.
Something that can be integrated into an existing infrastructure and then extended.
Now I want to automatically create new virtual machines with different operating systems in one click. Selected Arch clicked and after 5 minutes entered it via SSH. I chose FreeBSD, clicked, after 5 minutes I entered via VNC and drove it to PV.
Also, what is a convenient dashboard to show what is currently available, what axis is there and what CPU load, what RAM.
In the future, there may be another server and acc. there is a wish to have migration from this panel.
It would be very cool if you could make KVM on the second server and manage this entire system and Xen and KVM from one panel.

I was confused in the choice, they wrote too much of everything. OpenNebula seems to be nothing, but it's also full of all sorts of solutions. OpenStack, XenOrchestra, ConVirt 2.0, oVirt, OpenECP, Enomaly. What do you advise? And the main concern is that my network configuration works. And so that later you can reconfigure if the IPs appear on the bridges all. And please note that I have a simple Xen, not XCP. There is no way to put XCP already, and probably desire too.

Answer the question

In order to leave comments, you need to log in

4 answer(s)
I
intelligence, 2011-06-10
@intelligence

Not so long ago I came across, while there was no time to figure it out. Have a look: github.com/primalmotion/Archipel/wiki/

M
MNU, 2011-06-10
@MNU

proxmox.com/ does not really control xen, but if it does not prioritize.

S
schastny, 2011-06-11
@schastny

intelligence: Archipel was very pleased. Thanks for this discovery. The treasure was just unearthed. :) One of these days I will try. XMPP is also an interesting idea. I'm not going to say whether it's bad or good, but interesting. This is what it means to think outside the box. :) Too bad only ejabberd is supported.

D
Daniel Newman, 2012-07-15
@danielnewman

www.linux-kvm.org/page/Management_Tools is a good list, but I'm also leaning towards archipelago.
If our guys (Russian) bring their www.webvirtmgr.net/ to their mind and release stand-alone, maybe there will be a good product.

Didn't find what you were looking for?

Ask your question

Ask a Question

731 491 924 answers to any question