The choice of computer components for photo-video?

Question

Computers

I select the configuration of the computer. Tasks: Photo-video editing, programming. Use of all programs from the Adobe CS5 package. I don’t play toys at all, so I had the opinion that I didn’t need a strong video card.
1. The first consultant said that even a video card built into the processor is enough. Another said that Photoshop uses a new technology (I forgot what it's called) that requires a good graphics card. Who to believe?
2. Are discounts expected for the new year? I will take on the humpback.
3. Will hard drives become cheaper? Some recommend taking a small screw for now, then buying it in addition.
4. Recommend a simple 22-inch monitor with a good picture and color reproduction for working with graphics programs.

Answer 1

You need a good video card, but there is no point in chasing top-end gaming cards. Nvidia, modern, within 100-200 bucks - normal. Photoshop and video editors actively use the capabilities of the video card, this gives a huge acceleration, so do not skimp here. gts 450, gtx 550 - normal, gt 320-520 - if the budget is critical.
For video editing, if you have a video card, i7 is not really needed, i5 is enough, in fact, the percentage is not loaded much during video editing. But 16GB of memory would be better, it is not so expensive, but there is a lot of sense in it.
Hard drives now cost so much that it makes double sense to take an ssd for the system (intel of the latest generations or ocz vertex of the latest generations from 120GB in volume), and buy a disk for "torrents" later.
If you need good color reproduction from a monitor, then this is IPS, so forget about “simple and cheap”.
In fact, without a clear upper budget limit, the question is difficult to answer. In addition, although it’s a habr, we still recommend thg.ru or overclockers.ru for such questions.

Answer 2

2. No. In Russia, New Year's discounts begin in February.
3. In the near future - no. Take an SSD for the system (80-200 GB) and a second screw 500-1000 GB for data. Then buy/change. I don’t see any reason to take less than 500GB - the price / GB ratio is unprofitable.
If you decide to take an SSD, then only from the latest series, the speed parameters have dramatically improved there.
If the budget does not fit into the SSD, then I recommend immediately splitting the HDD into two partitions C: and D:, so that later it would be easier to migrate.
Well, read ixbt.com. There are also iron reviews on fcenter.ru

Answer 3

Take a normal video card, not built-in, without any bells and whistles, Photoshop uses OpenGL.
Prots take i5 or i7 if you work a lot with cutting and transcoding video. I advise you to take at least 4 gigabytes of RAM, 8 is better - illustrator and photoshop eat be healthy.
Samsung monitors are usually cheap and not particularly bad.

Answer 4

The technology is called CUDA and some PS plugins use it (Beauty Box, for example). Therefore, the video card should be taken from NVIDIA.

Answer 5

at least 16 or 24 gigabytes of RAM, where I don’t know the numbers 4 and 8 from.
I don’t have enough eight on a regular computer, and then there’s Photoshop and video.

Answer 6

1. Yes, the built-in Intel card can also be used by Photoshop. No CUDA is used there, only opengl.
Tested video cards | CS5: kb2.adobe.com/cps/831/cpsid_83117.html
1.5 Only cpu is used to [re]encode video, there are solutions on cuda, but the resulting quality is disgusting. Huge article on the topic: goo.gl/cz1H2
2. No (in Roiss New Year's discounts mean higher prices)
3. No (flooding in Thailand)
4. Dell has cheap IPS.

Answer 7

For the integrated graphics card in Sandy Bridge, you can download the render plugin for Premiere. Renders Full HD almost in real time. But the view will still hang. So for serious work with video, the HD 3000 does not pull at all.