Switching from linux to windows, pitfalls?

Question

linux

Good morning/afternoon/evening. Share your experience of moving from one OS to another. What problems can a person working with Linux face?

Answer 1

Yes, it shouldn't be a problem. To work, you can always run a Linux environment in a virtual machine.

Answer 2

Paid software, uncontrolled updates, viruses, hard-to-catch glitches (normal logging was not delivered to Windows). And so you can live.

Answer 3

Switching from linux to windows, pitfalls?

Yes, there are no special pitfalls. They are just different systems with different advantages and disadvantages.
You should be prepared for the fact that familiar things are done differently, or are difficult to implement in a different system.
The main problem during the transition, as a rule, is precisely the ignorance of the system to which you are switching.
All your previous experience will not help much here, you will have to master a new OS from scratch.
In general, the main problem is a misunderstanding of the new OS.

Answer 4

1. Any standard Linux distribution brings with it everything for a full-fledged work. Windows, when installed independently, is a bare useless system (well, ok, there is a browser, a solitaire and a media player). Manufacturers are rolling out essential utilities on laptops, but in self-installed win10 there is not even a photo viewer. A bunch of small software needs to be delivered. pdf, word processors, archivers - all this is not on Windows out of the box. Most of the codecs in Top 10 seem to have begun to arrive on their own, for a long time they also had to be installed by hand (yep, that is, it was like there was a player, but it really couldn’t watch anything other than wmv).
2. Lack of repositories. MS Store is garbage. If Google Play contains a lot of rubbish, but there are correct programs, then there is not even Steam in the MS Store, not to mention all sorts of useful utilities like winzip, etc. But a search, of course, will give you a bunch of Chinese adware with relevant names. In fact, all software must be searched in internets, download binaries (since they are compatible, see paragraph 5) from unreliable sources and set them manually (by the way, the concept of automatically installing the correct versions of dependencies is not familiar to Windows), often then update them with handles. And it is this process that leads to the infection of Windows machines with viruses (or at least adware) even among seasoned IT people.
Those. on Windows, it is recommended to first install antivirus with active protection, and only then you can install the rest of the software. Why MS has not yet mastered to make a normal store, I refuse to understand. This point for me is the sharpest reef.
3. Drivers. Under linux, you can easily understand what kind of devices you have. But it may not find the driver. On Windows, it's the other way around. You will most likely find the driver, but the system often cannot understand what kind of devices you have. Although it seems to have been cured in 10k, with a recent reinstallation in some century, I didn’t have to tell the system what kind of motherboard I had.
4. In normal mode, the Administrator does not have full access to the system. This is a culture shock for Linux users. To get full access, you need to reboot into special. mode (there seems to be an alternative hack, how to increase the level of privileges on a running system, but it is definitely not done with one mouse).
5. In Linux, most of the software relies on dynamic system libraries. In the visible, the software comes with static linking of system libraries. Accordingly, the size of any software and updates under Windows is many times larger. But if you have a good channel, then you won't notice it.
6. Windows recognizes usb ports. If you plug the device into another usb, Windows will consider it a new device. But this is usually a trifle, unless you are debugging devices via usb and fixing letters (well, yes, you will have letters instead of arbitrary mount points, although mount points are also somewhere) for external drives.
7. Linux easily reads Windows partitions. Windows with link works much worse.
8. Much less availability of documentation on fine-tuning the system, which generally tunes just as well as Linux.
9. On Linux, you can use gui and console equally. In Windows, in general, there will be only gui. powershell is quite convenient, but there is almost no software that works in the console. In particular, when developing, in Linux I run the IDE in order to somehow improve development, in Windows you can normally develop only in the IDE.
10. Sym, hard links. Consider that in Windows you will not have them. But the system will give you aliases of some of your directories in some situations.

Answer 5

If you are sitting on Linux and for some reason migrate to Microsoft, I think you will not have any problems, since windows, with all its minuses, is much easier (in terms of development) Linux, and if it is not difficult for you to use Linux, then master windows it will be as difficult for you as changing from gnome to kde

Answer 6

There will be only one problem - an obsessive desire to delve into the system's cats, twist something there, configure it, correct the config bypassing the system mechanisms. At least from all the stories of the transition that I heard, probably everyone ran into this.

Answer 7

the pitfalls are the same as during the reverse transition, the
first thing you encounter is - How?
how to do this, but how to do that, and there and there there are many solutions, how to do this or that task
, only over time you determine for yourself the most convenient way for yourself and perhaps the most correct
second - familiar software,
although this is more relevant just when switching from Windows to lean
when vice versa - this problem seems less acute to me

Answer 8

VKontakte opens here and there, there is no difference at all.
But seriously, it all depends on your needs and work environment. You can deploy an environment in a virtual machine, or you can manage to adapt WSL to some tasks ...
And so the question looks like just a desire to talk with the author.