Answer the question
In order to leave comments, you need to log in
Answer the question
In order to leave comments, you need to log in
The speed difference is huge. Plus, they are noisier and you really won’t put more than two.
PATA is obsolete and died safely.
Since it is physically possible to connect PATA disks there, then this is probably something from rare antiques, since it is still not in the trash.
Therefore, out of love for the beautiful, it is quite possible to stick PATA disks in there, for the entourage.
If you also have 80 GB sat disks, then there is no difference - the mechanics are the same, changing the interface does not affect the speed (I specify - for this, the outdated generation)
Oh, necrophilia ...
The difference in speed - well, three times (downwards).
The difference in the complexity of the setup is once in ... eleven (up), fuck with loops, limit of two disks per controller, inability to assemble a raid (most likely)
Nowadays, 160 gigabytes is not serious. Especially for the server. There it is necessary to take a disk of the order of a terabyte.
Didn't find what you were looking for?
Ask your questionAsk a Question
731 491 924 answers to any question