Should I underline links in an article?

Question

Search Engine Optimization

Good afternoon! Do you think it is necessary to underline links to important articles in the article or not?
For example
, with an underline - https://yadi.sk/i/bHMXxqaNmUSme
without an underline - https://yadi.sk/i/yLcpTE-bmUd5j

Answer 1

If your main audience is older people (40+), then blue may be more preferable, because. this is the base style. In general, I don’t see a fundamental difference, about the obligatory blue color and underlining - this is from the era of dinosaurs.
Now there are different combinations, including in my projects I used options with underlining / without underlining / with different colors. I did not notice any problems with navigation among users and, in principle, with ranking.
For examples, take the same feed that ditched the "classic" design mentioned and now uses red links without underlines.
As for your example specifically, I like it better without the underline, you can do it like on a toaster so that the underline is displayed only on hover.

Answer 2

Let 's listen to the classics :
Links should always be underlined, even if it seems ugly to someone.
You can't underline text on the web that isn't a link.
Removing the underline from the link when hovering over is stupid.
Active links should always be blue (with the exception of black or dark gray). Visited links should be purple. Links in other colors are guaranteed to confuse the reader.
The color reserved for links should not be used for other elements.
It is good and correct to highlight the link in red or orange when the cursor is hovered over it. As an option - highlight the background or frame around.
A dotted link means that clicking on the text will perform some action (a calculator will open, a hint will arrive, a detail will be revealed), and clicking again will return everything to its original state. Dashed links should not take the reader to another page. A solid underline, in turn, cannot be used for temporarily called elements.
Checking the design for correctness is simple: if the viewer, without touching the mouse, can guess where the link is and where it is not, we have a good site. This rule outweighs all others.
Personally, I agree with him.

Answer 3

I am for underlining, but only for underlining. I would advise you to make links in text color but with underlining. Thus, they will not be conspicuous, but it will be clear to the user that these are links.

Answer 4

It's a matter of taste, of course, but I'm against it. Such visual garbage seems redundant to me. Links should be somehow highlighted, with color or underlining - one thing is enough.

Answer 5

In my opinion, there is no single standard here. Web design does not stand still. Previously, there were only underlined links everywhere, but now this is a bit gone. But nobody says that underlining cannot be changed. If you want to do it the old fashioned way, then you don’t have to put a standard underline, transform it, make it, for example, not a simple line, but a wave - and then it will be even better. Or add a special effect. Improvisation takes over.

Answer 6

I think it's not important. The main thing is that the design should make it clear that this is a link.