T
T
topbanana2012-01-31 02:37:19
Automation
topbanana, 2012-01-31 02:37:19

Services that can help you conduct collection activities?

I have one friend who has not returned the debt for quite a long time. Recently, I decided to actively remind him of the debt. You can, of course, just periodically call a person, but you yourself get tired of such activities. There was an idea to somehow automate the process, preferably without financial costs.
So far, automation has gone as far as regularly sending bash script sms'ok through the textfree service. But, because The number of the message sender can also be added to the black list, the question arises: how else can a person remind himself of himself? Maybe there are some services for sending paper letters, or services through which you can make a call to a mobile phone? (even if the robot says something completely off topic into the phone, regular calls will remind the person that I remember him and want him to remember me too. And the fact that these calls are made on my initiative, he thinks , guess).

Answer the question

In order to leave comments, you need to log in

3 answer(s)
E
edogs, 2012-01-31
@topbanana

Generally speaking, this is not good and somewhere even illegal.
But answering the question
a) If you use comm. SMS sending services, the sender can be faked.
b) When registering on Google, if you often register from one IP, you can enter a phone number that the robot will call and dictate numbers.
c) The now deceased service kakashka.org delivered its idea.
d) A fresh and original idea - to sue, if there were witnesses or somehow manage to persuade him to sign a document on the debt (for example, by offering to be behind for a couple of months), then it is quite possible to win. Perhaps everything will end already at the stage of receiving a summons, who wants to run through the courts and pay the costs.

T
topbanana, 2012-01-31
@topbanana

Judging by the minuses in karma and for the question, I see that my idea is not perceived very well. To be honest, I don't quite understand why, but okay. As for the originality of the trial, it was, of course, a joke. If you pay attention, this is literally what is written:
- A fresh and original idea is to sue.
— The court is considered as an original idea.
Yes, the legislation in the Russian Federation and ours is similar. But if it were so simple, there would be no such agencies . Moreover, what I wanted to do (albeit with some reservations) is considered their normal practice, soft collection.
Why isn't there a court? Firstly, with some desire of the defendant, in our court, the consideration of the case can last about a year. Secondly, as I already mentioned, the person does not officially work and has never worked, he officially does not have any property either. In order not to seem like a completely monster attacking a defenseless person, I will say that the debtor is engaged in the resale of foreign cars, so that in fact he can return the debt in no time.
And finally, I will say that there will still be a court if my actions do not contribute to the return of the debt in the near future. Everything will be according to the law, without bits and soldering irons. With this, I ask you to consider the issue closed, thank you all.

M
Maxim Shishkin, 2012-01-31
@lsoul

“The court is considered as an original idea”
I’m just shocked by such words)
Such issues are resolved in court and its earnings play absolutely no role. There is a debt confirmed by an agreement. There will be a decision in your favor. and hand it over to the bailiffs, who confiscate the property in payment of the debt.
And you, excuse me, are sorting out some kind of kindergarten with calls and sms. It is necessary to solve such problems within the framework of the legal field.

Didn't find what you were looking for?

Ask your question

Ask a Question

731 491 924 answers to any question