R
R
rozhik2013-08-03 12:04:31
PostgreSQL
rozhik, 2013-08-03 12:04:31

Portability of dumps

Before 2002 I used postgres. Now I use only for OSM. But, the rock is related to the fact that
1. database dumps had to be processed manually when importing into a new version
2. not infrequently, when updating the postgres version, triggers or indexes were bent
3. during the vacuum, it was impossible to make a select
forced me to switch to mysql + middleware.

Question.
1. Are there still such problems?
2. How difficult it is to restore the database after hardware errors, power outages, etc. (the base is non-replicable).

PS I'm interested in practice (now, judging by what I read, there are no such problems in principle. But even then there were fewer mats for postgres than for muscle or oracle).

Answer the question

In order to leave comments, you need to log in

1 answer(s)
J
joneleth, 2013-08-04
@joneleth

1.1. Shield?
1.2. I have not heard of this, although I did not have to upgrade particularly complex databases.
1.3. The vacuum is no longer needed.
2. Well, there should be a backup anyway. For all the time I remember only one case when I had to repair the database. Honestly, I do not remember what was the matter, but somehow it was easily solved.
In general - use on health. I always prefer Postgres whenever possible, I have never regretted it.

Didn't find what you were looking for?

Ask your question

Ask a Question

731 491 924 answers to any question