Answer the question
In order to leave comments, you need to log in
No @2x graphics for retin, does it make sense to interpolate it in Photoshop?
The designer prepared only @1x images in the layout for layout. Question: Will bitmaps on @2x retinas be less soapy if Photoshop interpolates the original @1x graphic into @2x? Naturally, loss of quality is inevitable, but is there a way to generate better @2x graphics than the soapy one that is rendered automatically on retinas?
Answer the question
In order to leave comments, you need to log in
I wouldn't bother. First of all, it's possible that only @1x images were created for a reason. Offhand - for the sake of economy, so that the pictures load faster. It is clear that the quality will suffer in the retina, but the download speed is more critical (we choose the lesser of two evils).
Secondly, devices with a retina display are increasingly upscaling. That is, the operating system, video card or browser independently enhances the low-resolution image.
As for the question itself. The interpolation method and post-processing are highly dependent on the graphics themselves. That is, it is necessary to look and experiment. But if you need it simply and not confused, then Photoshop supports automatic interpolation, after which you can apply sharpness.
Don't say it's worth it. In fact, it's probably not worth it.
Didn't find what you were looking for?
Ask your questionAsk a Question
731 491 924 answers to any question