Answer the question
In order to leave comments, you need to log in
Answer the question
In order to leave comments, you need to log in
I also heard everything out of the corner of my ear - but so that it was more serious - xs.
Of course, VA and IPS matrices have better viewing angles and color reproduction - but how much does this affect the harm to the eyes ...
Well, high contrast is definitely an argument. But this is only one of the criteria.
Others - how the light falls on the monitor, how you sit in front of the monitor, whether you do micropauses and periodic exercises for the eyes.
First of all, the general quality of ergonomics affects the eyes - and there are excellent monitors on any matrices.
This is the most important thing to do in order to stay healthy.
Additionally, it is worth mentioning that the monitor itself is not so important for reading, how important is what is shown on the screen.
There are special programs for the correct display of text, so that the eyes are comfortable (readers). There are programs that automatically adjust the monitor for comfortable reading. On my laptop (lenovo) there is one in the standard delivery (readability mode).
Vopschem think wider.
For laptop monitors, there is such an article on Habré.
But for external monitors - the choice is mainly only in the type of matrix - it's just not worth sparing money here - the monitor. This is the most important part of the computer for your health.
I heard that PVA matrices are the most
I found this model
market.yandex.ru/model.xml?modelid=7322946&hid=91052&suggest=1
on ixbt, it also has good reviews, but this model is already a little old and can only be found in the city from the window (which is not very desirable).
I'll make a reservation right away: the topic is old, so I can lie about something :)
About PVA for text, this is a thing from the distant past. Then there were fast TN matrices, they were taken for games. Slow PVA / MVA, which were taken for texts. IPS was prohibitively expensive for professional graphics work.
TN devices were distinguished by poor viewing angles, worse color rendering, and there was also such a jamb: on a flat background, you could notice interpixel gaps - a grid that “presses” on your eyes during prolonged work (I don’t know how common this was a jamb, but I met on several different TN monitors) - all this made these monitors bad for working with text.
Currently, the difference between technologies is no longer so great, but VA / IPS for texts still rule
Chose a year ago. As a result, I bought this one: www.overclockers.ru/lab/45416_4/V_pogone_za_liderami_rynka._Obzor_i_testirovanie_monitora_ASUS_PA246Q.html The model cost more than other contenders (around 20,000 rubles). The advantage is that the monitor does not have LED (W-LED), which allegedly have more problems with this PWM, but good old lamps, but this has a drawback. The monitor is hefty and eats a lot of energy. But these shortcomings are not critical for me at all.
Although my personal opinion, my old 19 (which at one time cost a lot of money) is much more camphorine in terms of reading and writing, and he doesn’t seem to see PWM at all and his eyes get tired of him less.
In the same link you can read about other monitors that are with LED backlight.
PS In general, I really don’t understand why they don’t make monitors with an indication that it is safe for the eyes as a plus, otherwise they constantly reduce all kinds of pixel sizes, they come up with new matrices, which supposedly the pixel speed is 1 less (Wow ...). It would be impossible to make monitors that do not have these flickering, but have some kind of safe coatings, like on computer glasses (as an example of an idea).
Didn't find what you were looking for?
Ask your questionAsk a Question
731 491 924 answers to any question